Search Results for "area restriction removal"

370 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 370 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Issuance of Occupation Certificate for Committed Development Under UDCPR Regulation 5.1.3. Development Permission Granted Before Draft Regional Plan Publication Protects Builder's Right to Occupation Certificate Despite Subsequent Agricultural Reservation in Regional Plan.

The petitioner, Raj Realtors, a partnership firm, constructed ten buildings comprising 446 residential and 20 commercial units on land at Mouje Pashan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rule M-3 of DCPR for Satara Region as Ultra Vires. Rule requiring 12m wide access road for plot subdivision is a valid development control regulation under MRTP Act, 1966 and does not amount to uncompensated acquisition.

The petitioners, Suhas Shridhar Shahane and Subhash Kondiram Sawant, landowners in Satara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application of Lessor in Rent Control Exclusion Case. Company That Lost Rent Control Protection Due to High Paid-Up Share Capital Cannot Regain It by Subsequent Reduction.

The case involves a dispute between M/s. Depe Global Shipping Agencies Pvt. Ltd. (Plaintiff/Lessor) and M/s. Mather and Platt (India) Ltd. (Defendant/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tender Notification for Borewell Drilling Due to Unreasonable Local District Restriction — Condition Restricting Participation to Contractors of Chitradurga District Held Arbitrary and Violative of Article 14 of Constitution of India.

The petitioners, who are contractors engaged in drilling borewells, challenged a communication dated 02-11-2023 from the Department of Backward Classe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Removal from LPG Distributorship Panel - Site Location Dispute Resolved in Favor of Petitioner. The court held that the term 'Mouda' in the advertisement includes the Gram Panchayat area, and removal without hearing violates natural justice.

The petitioner, Mukesh Tiwari, applied for an LPG distributorship in Mouda pursuant to an advertisement by Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) and o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Developer in Slum Rehabilitation Project Due to Non-Compliance with Scheme Conditions. Order of CEO SRA Upheld as Developer Found to Have Violated Terms of Agreement and Failed to Complete Project.

The petitioner, a company engaged as a developer for a slum rehabilitation project on a property owned by a cooperative housing society, filed a writ ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Scrutiny Committee's Requirement of Proof of Migration from Specified Areas for Thakur Scheduled Tribe Status. Scrutiny Committee's Rejection Based on Non-Migration from Earlier Specified Areas Challenged.

The matter arose from two writ petitions before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging orders of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears State's Appeal Against Quashing of Acquisition of Part of Building Without Land Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The High Court Held That Acquisition of a Portion of a Building Without Acquiring the Land Beneath It is Invalid.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against a common judgment of the High Court dated 10.3.2006 in two writ petitions filed by Reliance Industries Ltd. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.

The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...