Search Results for "appealable orders"

312 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 312 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds That Question of Excisability of Goods Is a Question of Rate of Duty Appealable Only to Supreme Court Under Section 35L(2) of Central Excise Act, 1944, and Amendment Inserting Sub-section (2) Is Clarificatory in Nature.

The case involves a reference to a Full Bench of the Bombay High Court to determine the appealability of a Tribunal order regarding excisability of go...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against NGT Orders in Sterlite Copper Plant Closure Case — Upholds Maintainability of Composite Appeal Under NGT Act. The Court held that a composite appeal under Section 16 of the NGT Act is maintainable and that closure orders without natural justice are invalid.

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals arising from orders of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) concerning the closure of a copper smelter p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Commercial Appeal by Appellant Against Order Rejecting Return of Plaint Application -- Maintainability Under Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and CPC -- Jurisdiction Dispute in Commercial Suit

The High Court dismissed a commercial appeal filed against an order rejecting an application under Order VII Rule 10 of CPC seeking return of plaint o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute Over Succession and Title — Upholds Trial Court's Finding That Plaintiff Failed to Prove Ownership. Succession Certificate Not Conclusive Proof of Title; Plaintiff Must Establish Independent Right to Property.

The appellant, Madhukar Venkatesh Ullal, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking declaration of title and possession of a property. He claimed t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Division Bench Order in Trade Mark Infringement Suit Due to Non-maintainable Intra-court Appeal. The Single Judge's Order Granting Time to File Affidavit-in-Opposition Was Not a 'Judgment' Under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, Making the Appeal Inadmissible.

The dispute arose from a civil suit filed by the respondent-plaintiff against the appellant-defendants for infringement of the registered trade mark '...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Holding Order Under Section 73A Not Appealable Under Section 70 of Mumbai Public Trust Act. Intervention Order Under Section 73A Is Interlocutory and Not a Final Order Under Section 22, Hence No Appeal Lies Under Section 70.

The appellant, a registered reporting trustee of a public trust, filed a change report under Section 22 of the Mumbai Public Trust Act, 1950. The resp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside Order Refusing Territorial Jurisdiction Under Section 9. Court Holds That Part of Cause of Action Arising in Goa Confers Jurisdiction on Goa Courts.

The appellants, M/s. Nivaran Solutions and its partners, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against an or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside Order Refusing Territorial Jurisdiction for Section 9 Application. Court Holds That Cause of Action Arises Partly in Goa Where Agreements Were to Be Performed, Conferring Jurisdiction on Goa Courts.

The appellants, M/s. Nivaran Solutions (a partnership firm) and its partners, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act...