Search Results for "apartment buyer agreement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "apartment buyer agreement"

44 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 44 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Builder's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Forfeiture of Earnest Money — Reduces Forfeiture from 20% to 10% of Basic Sale Price. Court upholds NCDRC's power to strike down unconscionable contractual terms but modifies interest rate and forfeiture percentage based on facts.

10 Feb 2025

The present appeal arises from a consumer complaint filed by the respondents (buyers) against the appellant (builder, Godrej Projects Development Limi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Apartmentalisation in Chandigarh Residential Plots to Preserve City's Original Character. Fragmentation of single dwelling units into multiple apartments violates Rule 16 of Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007 and the Chandigarh Master Plan 2031.

10 Jan 2023

The case involves a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Chandigarh Citizens Forum (appellants) against the Chandigarh Administration and others, s...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Consumer Complaint Against Builder for Refund of Consideration Due to Premature Filing and Lack of Deficiency Proof. Complaint Filed Before Expiry of Contractual Grace Period Under Allotment Terms, and Appellants Failed to Establish Incomplete Work or Delay in Possession Offer.

16 Sep 2022

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by the appellants against the respondent-company, a builder, alleging deficiency in service due to d...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in MRTP Act Case Upholding Commission's Finding of No Unfair Trade Practices. The Court Held That Extra Charges and Cancellation of Apartment Allotment Were Contractual and Did Not Constitute Unfair Trade Practices Under Sections 36-A and 36-B of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969.

25 Jan 2022

The appeal arose from a judgment dated 19.01.2009 by the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission, New Delhi, which dismissed a complaint...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Developer's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Delayed Possession and Refund. The court upheld the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission's order for refund with interest, rejecting the developer's argument that possession delivery period should start from Fire NOC date under the Apartment Buyers Agreement, as construction had commenced earlier.

21 Jan 2022

The appeals arose under Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 from the decision of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission on co...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in Real Estate Regulation Case, Upholding Authority's Jurisdiction and Pre-deposit Condition. The court affirmed that a single member of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority has jurisdiction to order refunds under Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, and the pre-deposit requirement under Section 43(5) is valid for statutory appeals.

11 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from appeals filed by promoters and real estate developers against orders of the High Court of Allahabad, which had dismissed their ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Flat Buyers Against Developer for Delayed Possession, Holds Unilateral Compensation Clause Unfair. Developer's stipulation of Rs 5 per sq ft per month as liquidated damages for delay held inadequate and unconscionable; flat buyers entitled to compensation at 6% per annum on amounts paid.

24 Aug 2020

The case involves appeals by 171 flat buyers against the dismissal of their consumer complaint by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Builder's Appeals in Consumer Cases, Sets Aside Refund Order. Clause 11.4 of Builder-Buyer Agreement Limits Developer's Liability to Refund Only if Agreement is Terminated; Allottees Not Entitled to Refund Without Termination.

1 Jan 2020

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in ten consumer cases filed by allottees again...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Refund to Flat Purchaser for Inordinate Delay in Possession — Builder's Unfair Contract Terms Not Binding. Builder's failure to apply for occupancy certificate within stipulated time constitutes deficiency of service; one-sided clauses in Apartment Buyer's Agreement are unfair and not binding under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

2 Apr 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals filed by Pioneer Urban Land & Infrastructure Ltd. against orders of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Maharashtra Tax on Lotteries, Betting and Gambling Act, 2006 — Levy on Entry Fee for Games of Skill and Chance Upheld. The Court held that the tax on entry fee for games like poker, rummy, and bridge is a valid compensatory tax under Entry 62 of List II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India.

10 Apr 2012

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Tax on Lotteries, Betting and Gambling Act,...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)