Somanahalli Toll Plaza Case: Karnataka High Court Protects Local Residents from Daily Toll Charges.
28 Jan 2026The Karnataka High Court partly allowed a writ petition filed by residents of Somanahalli, Nelaguli and Kaggalipura villages challen...
Search Results for "annual fee"
259 result(s) found
Found 259 result(s)
Supreme Court
Court Rules on Bar Council Enrolment Fees: Balancing Statutory Limits and Practical Necessities. Ensuring Accessibility and Fairness in Legal Profession Entry While Addressing Operational Costs
30 Jul 2024The judgment addresses the issue of whether the enrolment fees charged by State Bar Councils (SBCs) exceed the statutory limits set by Section 24(1)(f...
- 379
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows NDMC Appeals in Property Tax Dispute — Upholds Unit Area Method as Valid. The impugned Bye-laws are not ultra vires the NDMC Act, 1994, as they fall within the rule-making power under Section 388 and are consistent with Section 63.
30 Jan 2019The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) against the Delhi High Court judgment dated August 10, 2017, whi...
- 200
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Corporation in Water Tax Levy Under UP Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1975 - Reverses Refund Order. Water and Sewerage Tax Imposed on Premises is Valid as Tax on Lands and Buildings Under Entry 49 of List II, Not a Fee, Under Section 52(1)(a) of the Act.
22 Oct 2021The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by the first respondent, Pradeshiya Industrial and Investment Corporation, challenging the levy of water ...
- 196
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Telecom Company's Claim for Refund of Entry Fee After 2G Licences Quashed Due to Illegal Government Policy. Restitution Under Section 65 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 Denied as Quashing Did Not Render Contracts Void, and Set-Off Policy Upheld Under Article 14 of Constitution.
3 Mar 2022The dispute involved a telecom company seeking a refund of an Entry Fee of Rs 1454.94 crores paid for 2G licences across twenty-one service areas, aft...
- 277
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Locus of Parents in Fee Regulation. Individual parents held to have standing under Maharashtra Educational Institutes (Regulation of Fees) Act to approach Divisional Fee Regulatory Committee.
18 Jul 2017The Bombay High Court heard two writ petitions challenging the locus of individual parents to approach the Divisional Fee Regulatory Committee (DFRC) ...
- 49
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Restores Fee Regulatory Committee's Determination in Telangana Professional College Fee Dispute. Court Sets Aside High Court's Re-determination of Fees for B.E./B.Tech Courses for Block Period 2016-2019, Upholding Expert Committee's Uniform Fee of Rs.97,000 per Student.
1 Jul 2019The Supreme Court considered appeals arising from a dispute over the fixation of fee structure for B.E. and B.Tech courses in private unaided professi...
- 290
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Court Fee Valuation Dispute: Circle Rate Not Conclusive for Market Value Under Section 7(iv-A) of Court Fees Act. The Court held that the market value for court fee purposes must be determined based on pleadings and evidence, not merely the circle rate fixed by the Collector.
19 Feb 2020The appellant, Agra Diocesan Trust Association, filed two suits (O.S. 24/2013 and O.S. 25/2013) in the court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Dehradu...
- 519
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Against Trial Court's Order on Court Fee in Partition Suit — Section 35(1) of Karnataka Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958. The court held that the trial court must first determine the market value of the suit properties before directing the plaintiff to pay proper court fee.
24 Aug 2021The petitioner, Anjanappa, filed a suit for partition (O.S.No.808/2008) before the Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Devanahalli, seeking 1/3rd share i...
- 97
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds High Court Judgment Directing Shift of Toll Plaza for Violation of National Highways Fee Rules. Construction at 194 km of NH30 Found to Violate Rule 8 of National Highways Fee (Determination of Rates and Collection) Rules, 2008 Due to Lack of Written Reasons and Failure to Meet Conditions for Municipal Area Placement.
23 Sep 2021The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by respondents 1 to 17 (writ petitioners) seeking to restrain the construction of a toll plaza at 194 km ...
- 266
