Search Results for "amusement park"

15 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 15 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Land Conversion Case Due to Non-Compliance with Policy Conditions. Petitioner's Claim for Leasehold to Freehold Conversion Failed as Land Area and Capital Investment Did Not Meet Mandatory Requirements Under Uttar Pradesh Tourism Policy, 2013.

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by a company challenging the order dated 24.01.2022 issued by respondent No. 1, which rejected its propos...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Entertainment Duty on Amusement Park Admission Fee. Lumpsum Charge for Entry and Entertainment is Subject to Duty Under Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923.

The petitioners, Pan India Paryatan Limited and its director, owned and operated an amusement park in Greater Bombay which opened to the public on 25t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Upholds Entertainment Duty on APSARA Award Function; Deletes Penalty. Petitioner's challenge to entertainment duty dismissed, penalty reduced due to legal interpretation issues.

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges the order dated 28th September 2007, confirming an entertainment duty demand o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Directs Authorities to Decide License Renewal Application for Water Park Within Two Weeks. Writ of Mandamus Issued for Consideration of Renewal Application Under Articles 14, 19, and 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Gujarat Amusement and Funworld Pvt. Ltd., filed a Special Civil Application under Articles 14, 19, and 226 of the Constitution of Indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Video Game Parlour Licence Despite Parking Concerns, Emphasizes Reasonable Exercise of Police Powers Under Bombay Police Act, 1951. Commissioner's Refusal Based on Mere Apprehension Without Specific Evidence Held Arbitrary.

The petitioner, Jagdish N. Shetty, sole proprietor of M/s. Om Sai Video Game Parlour, applied for a licence under the Bombay Police Act, 1951 to opera...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Wilful Disobedience of Order to Vacate Premises — Failure to File Undertaking and Pay Dues Not Contempt as Substantive Compliance Achieved.

The contempt petition was filed by Hukum Chand Deswal (petitioner) against Satish Raj Deswal (respondent) alleging wilful disobedience of the Supreme ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Demolition Notices for Hotels/Restaurants in Thane — Municipal Corporation's Action Quashed for Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Proper Hearing Under Section 478 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

The judgment involves a group of ten writ petitions filed by owners/occupiers of hotels, bars, and restaurants in Thane city, challenging demolition n...