Search Results for "agricultural marketing board"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "agricultural marketing board"

133 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 133 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeal Challenging Election Notification for Co-operative Society Elections. Appellant's challenge to election notification under Section 39A of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 fails as court finds no violation of statutory provisions or rules.

9 Jun 2026

The appellant, Sri Santosh Kumar T.C., President/Delegate of Shri Thyluramadevi Poultry Farmers Co-op Society Ltd., filed a writ appeal challenging th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Lottery Allotment of Large Gala in APMC Market, Sets Aside High Court's Order Directing Allotment to Respondent No.2. The Court held that the High Court erred in relying on an earlier order of the Director of Agricultural Marketing without independently assessing eligibility, and that the lottery method was valid.

10 Jul 2019

The Supreme Court considered appeals against the Bombay High Court's judgment dated 21.11.2018, which directed the allotment of large Gala No.F-158 in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Election of Agriculture Produce Market Committee Due to Non-Compliance with Reservation Rules. Court holds that failure to provide reservation for Scheduled Tribes in the office of Chairperson as per Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 and Rules renders the election process invalid.

6 May 2019

The petitioners, eleven agriculturists from Bhandara district, filed a writ petition challenging the election of the Agriculture Produce Market Commit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Supersession of Agricultural Produce Market Committee for Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Compliance with Section 45(1) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development & Regulation) Act, 1963. Show-cause notice under Section 45(1) must specify charges and opportunity of hearing must be granted before superseding the Board.

25 Apr 2017

The petitioners, who were the elected Board of Directors of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Malegaon, challenged the order of the District ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Petitions of APMC Members Challenging Government Circular on Term of Committee — Statutory Rule Under Rule 14(4) of KAPM(R&D) Rules, 1968 Prevails. The court held that the term of the committee continues until the first meeting of the newly constituted committee, and a government circular cannot override the statutory rule.

13 Jun 2016

The case involved a batch of writ petitions filed by members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC) challenging a government c...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds Validity of APMC Bye-Laws Requiring Traders to Obtain Licenses and Pay Market Fees — Held that Bye-Laws Framed Under Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1966 Are Statutory and Binding. Writ petitions challenging bye-laws dismissed as not maintainable without challenging the parent Act.

13 Jun 2016

The petitioners, who are members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee, filed writ petitions challenging the validity of certain bye...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Appointment of Administrator for APMC Committee — Appointment of Administrator Without Prior Notice and Without Considering Representation Violates Principles of Natural Justice. The court held that the power under Section 121 of the Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966 must be exercised in accordance with natural justice, and failure to issue show cause notice renders the appointment invalid.

13 Jun 2016

The petitioners, who were the President, Vice President, and members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC), challenged the ap...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Petitions of APMC Committee Members Challenging Government Circular Curtailing Term. Section 7(2) of Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966 mandates continuation of committee until newly elected committee assumes office, overriding executive instructions.

13 Jun 2016

The petitioners, members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee, challenged a Government Circular dated 22-04-2016 that purported to ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Village Panchayat Member for Being Servant of Agricultural Produce Market Committee. Agricultural Produce Market Committee Held to be a Local Authority Under Section 14(1)(i) of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958, and Section 3(31) of General Clauses Act, 1897.

22 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Babasaheb Devram Sathe, was elected as a member of the Gram Panchayat, Jalgaon Budruk, in 2010 and also functioned as Sarpanch. The fi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Amalgamation Notification for Lack of Consent — Amalgamation Under Section 44 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act Requires Consent of Both Market Committees. Withdrawal of Consent by One Committee Renders the Process Invalid.

17 Aug 2010

The petitioners, Sopanrao Sathe (Chairman) and the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Malkapur, challenged a notification dated 17-01-2009 ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)