Search Results for "ad-interim order"

363 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 363 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Division Bench Order in Trade Mark Infringement Suit Due to Non-maintainable Intra-court Appeal. The Single Judge's Order Granting Time to File Affidavit-in-Opposition Was Not a 'Judgment' Under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, Making the Appeal Inadmissible.

The dispute arose from a civil suit filed by the respondent-plaintiff against the appellant-defendants for infringement of the registered trade mark '...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Interim Relief in SARFAESI Act Case — Civil Suit Held Not Maintainable Due to Bar Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act. Borrowers Must Avail Remedy Under Section 17 Before DRT Instead of Seeking Injunction in Civil Court.

The case involves an appeal filed by the appellants, who are borrowers and guarantors, against an order of the Commercial Division of the Bombay High ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Reappointment of District Forum Presidents Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Section 10(2) of the Act Prescribes a Single Term of Five Years or Until Age 65, Barring Reappointment.

The judgment addresses a common question arising in multiple writ petitions: whether the President of a District Forum constituted under Section 10 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Award Debtors' Application to Stay Execution of Consent Interim Award in Arbitration Matter. Challenge to Interim Consent Award After 6 Years Held Time-Barred Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves chamber summonses taken out by the award debtors (Swarup Group of Industries & Anr.) seeking to stay the execution of an interim con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'EVANOVA' vs 'ECONOVA' for Pharmaceutical Products. Marks Held Deceptively Similar Under Section 29 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The Plaintiff, Charak Pharma Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. seeking a perpetual injunction restraining the Defendant fr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjourns Anti-Suit Injunction Appeal Against Bank — No Ad-Interim Relief Granted Pending Reply. Court Considers Whether Indian Court Can Restrain Foreign Proceedings When Foreign Decree Would Be Executable in India Under CPC Sections 13, 14, 44A.

The appeal arises from an order dated 25 November 2013 passed by the City Civil Court, Greater Mumbai, refusing to grant ad-interim relief in an anti-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Ad-Interim Injunction in Arbitration Matter — No Irreparable Harm Shown. Court declines to interfere with interim order restraining redevelopment pending final hearing of arbitration petition under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, Middle Income Group Cooperative Society Limited, filed an appeal against an ad-interim order dated 29th March 2010 passed by a learned ...