Search Results for "Well-known Mark"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Well-known Mark"

9 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Motion in Trade Mark Infringement Case Involving Use of Registered Mark as Corporate Name for Dissimilar Goods. The Full Bench overruled Raymond Ltd v Raymond Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd and held that Section 29(5) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 provides a separate cause of action for infringement when a registered trade mark is used as a corporate or trading name, even for dissimilar goods.

1 Mar 2017

The case involves a Notice of Motion in a suit filed by CIPLA Limited against M/s. CIPLA Industries Private Limited and Vishal Khanna for alleged infr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case Under Trade Marks Act, 1999. Registered Trademark 'RENAISSANCE' Found Infringed by 'SAI RENAISSANCE' Due to Deceptive Similarity and Transborder Reputation Under Section 29(4).

19 Jan 2022

The appeal arose from a trademark infringement dispute between an appellant-plaintiff, a global hotel chain incorporated in Delaware, USA, and respond...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit by 'VOGUE' Magazine Owner Against 'JUST IN VOGUE' Retail Services. Well-Known Mark 'VOGUE' Protected Against Use for Dissimilar Services Under Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

19 Sep 2016

The Plaintiffs, Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc. and its subsidiary, are the proprietors and users of the trademark 'VOGUE' in respect of magazines a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — No Interim Relief Granted for Alleged Deceptive Similarity Between 'DEXORANGE' and 'LUPINEXORANGE'. The court held that the marks were visually and phonetically distinct, and the appellant failed to establish a prima facie case for interim injunction.

10 Feb 2017

The appellant, Franco-Indian Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal against an order of the learned Single Judge refusing to grant interim relief ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Interim Injunction in Design Infringement and Passing Off Case — Registered Design Owner Granted Protection Against Infringement. Court Confirms That Substantial Similarity to Registered Design Constitutes Infringement Under Section 22 of Designs Act, 2000, and That Interim Relief Is Properly Granted When Prima Facie Case, Balance of Convenience, and Irreparable Loss Are Established.

20 Feb 2018

The present appeal was filed by the original defendants (Kalpesh R. Jain, Ravi Raut, and Ketan Panchal) against the order and judgment dated 06.12.201...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bail Application of Accused in UAPA Case on Grounds of Parity and Merits. Parity with co-accused granted bail is not a valid ground when the applicant's role is distinct and the first bail application was rejected on merits.

23 Dec 2015

The applicant, Dr. Gokarakonda Naga Saibaba, filed a second bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment of Plaint in Eviction Suit. Amendment to Clarify Property Description Allowed Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC as No Prejudice Caused to Tenant.

10 Oct 2014

The petitioner, M/s K.T. Kubal & Company, was a tenant in a building owned by the respondent, Mujibur Rehman Haji Israr Alam Siddiqui. The respondent ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment of Plaint in Eviction Suit — Pre-Trial Amendment Allowed Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC as No Prejudice Caused to Tenant. Amendment of plaint to clarify property description and add alternative grounds was permissible at pre-trial stage to determine real controversy between landlord and tenant.

10 Oct 2014

The petitioner, M/s K.T. Kubal & Company, a tenant, challenged the order of the Small Causes Court allowing the respondent/plaintiff to amend the plai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Cancels Bail of Accused in Tiger Poaching Case Under Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 — Accused Found to Be Financier and Key Link in Transnational Wildlife Trafficking.

12 Dec 2014

The State of Maharashtra (Forest Department) filed an application under Section 439(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 seeking cancellation of ba...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)