Search Results for "Vakalatnama"

182 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 182 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Appellants in Forgery Case for Clerical Error in Vakalatnama. High Court's Direction to Lodge Complaint Set Aside for Lack of Satisfaction Under Section 340 CrPC.

The case arises from a criminal appeal against the judgment of the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court dated 14.09.2016, which dismissed the anticipato...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Rules on Advocate Appearances and Vakalatnama Compliance in Court Proceedings. Supreme Court Bars Unauthorized Advocate Appearances, Reinforces Accountability in Legal Practice

The Supreme Court, in its judgment dated 20.09.2024, had directed that only authorized advocates could mark their appearances in court, and the Advoca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Decree in Suit for Want of Written Statement. Rule 89 of Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules Allows Judgment Without Separate Notice of Motion Where Written Statement Not Filed Within Time.

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by the 1st defendant (Aviation Travels Pvt Ltd) seeking to set aside an ex parte order dated 7th October 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Ex-Parte Decree in Property Dispute — Service of Summons Valid Through Vakalatnama Filed by Constituted Attorney

The case pertains to a suit filed by respondent No.1 (Bhavesha Suresh Goradia) against the appellant (Aviation Travels Pvt. Ltd.) and others seeking p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Impleadment Application in Property Suit — Plaintiffs Fail to Establish Prima Facie Title or Possession. Order 1 Rule 10 CPC requires direct legal interest; vague claims of possession without documentary evidence insufficient for impleadment.

The judgment pertains to a Notice of Motion filed by the plaintiffs in a suit seeking a declaration of ownership and possession of a property. The pla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Addresses Misconduct by Advocates-on-Record and Senior Advocates; Calls for Reforms in Senior Advocate Designation Process

Court Emphasizes Ethical Standards, Accountability, and the Need for Robust Guidelines to Uphold Integrity in the Legal Profession The court recalle...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Sets Aside Review Order Recalling Judgment Due to Non-Filing of Vakalatnama. Service of Notice Held Complete and Arguments Not Collusive, Hence Recall Unjustified Under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.

The dispute arose from a specific performance suit filed on 15.10.2010 by the appellant, Shree Chaitanya Constructions, against eight defendants. Only...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Partition Suit Involving Compromise Decree Validity. Dispute pertained to joint family properties and a compromise decree under Order XXIII Rule 3 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, with allegations of sham nature.

The Supreme Court of India heard two civil appeals arising from a Division Bench judgment of the Madras High Court dated 23.11.2011, which had dismiss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Applications to Recall Consent Terms and Set Aside Consent Decrees in Property Disputes Between Family Members. Court Holds That Consent Terms Recorded by Counsel Are Binding on Parties and Cannot Be Challenged on Grounds of Fraud Without Proper Pleadings and Evidence.

The judgment pertains to two Notice of Motions filed by the defendants in two separate suits seeking recall and setting aside of consent terms and con...