Search Results for "Upsarpanch"

30 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 30 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Setting Aside of Sarpanch Election Due to Procedural Violation. Election by show of hands after demand for secret ballot under Rule 10 of Bombay Village Panchayats (Sarpanch and Upsarpanch) Election Rules, 1964 is void.

The petitioner, Sau. Kalpana w/o Laxman Bhujbal, was elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Mategaon on 29.8.2010. During the meeting, after a majority...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of 50% Reservation for Women in Gram Panchayats — Rule 3(1)(c) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats (Reservation of Seats for Women) Rules, 1995 Held Intra Vires the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Article 243D of the Constitution.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by Shri Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale against the judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Election of Sarpanch and UpSarpanch by Draw of Lots. Inclusion of Blank Chits in Draw Does Not Invalidate Election Under Section 33(4) of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1960 and Rule 16 of Election Rules, 1964.

The case involves an appeal against a Single Judge's order that upheld the election of respondents as Sarpanch and UpSarpanch of Gram Panchayat Wadhon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Murder and Rioting in Land Dispute Case. Appellant Jayawant convicted under Section 302 IPC for causing death by axe blow during a group attack over election rivalry.

The case arises from an incident on 18 December 1986 at 2:30 p.m. in a field called 'Shericha Mala' in Village Nazare Supe, owned by the deceased Baji...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch. Notice Signed by Majority of Total Members of Grampanchayat is Valid Under Section 55(2) of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Shivkant Bangar and Gavlan Tekale challenging the no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gr...