Search Results for "Unexplained Investment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Unexplained Investment"

64 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 64 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Forfeiture Case Under Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976. The court upheld the forfeiture of a theatre property as the appellants failed to prove legitimate sources of funds and were associates of a person detained under COFEPOSA, with no entitlement to pay a fine in lieu of forfeiture under Section 9.

22 Mar 2023

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Karnataka upholding an order forfeiting M/s. Platinum Theatre under the Smugglers and Foreign Ex...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice and Assessment Order in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment under Section 147/148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 invalid as based on same material already considered in original assessment under Section 143(3).

20 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Pushpa Nahata, challenged a notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 30 March 2022 and an assessment order dated 22 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Appointment of Court Receiver in Favor of Appellants in Commercial Suits Involving Secured Creditors. Appointment of receiver without notice and without considering secured creditors' rights under SARFAESI Act is unsustainable.

13 Oct 2022

The judgment arises from two commercial appeals filed by Future Corporate Resources Pvt Ltd and Ojas Tradelease And Mall Management Pvt Ltd against or...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against WPL in Super Bazar Revival Case — No Willful Disobedience of Orders Found. Revival Scheme Implemented Under Court Supervision; Payments Made as Directed.

5 Mar 2020

The judgment pertains to contempt petitions filed against M/s Writers and Publishers Pvt. Ltd. (WPL) alleging willful disobedience of court orders in ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside District Court's Order That Had Set Aside Arbitral Award on Grounds Beyond Section 34 Scope. The Court Held That Reappreciation of Evidence Is Not Permissible Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the District Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction.

21 Nov 2019

The appellant, M/s. Scigen Biopharma Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order d...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case — Valuation by District Registrar Without Reasons Held Perverse. Tribunal's finding that valuation by District Registrar/Appellate Authority is more effective and realistic without assigning any reasons is perverse, arbitrary, and unsustainable under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961.

7 Jun 2016

The appeal was filed by the assessee, an individual engaged in transport business, under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Block Assessment Case — Unexplained Investment and Worker Count Issues Remanded. Held that advances to sister concern from disclosed bank account cannot be treated as unexplained investment without proper inquiry, and that clerical staff may be counted as workers for deduction under Section 80-IA.

5 Nov 2014

The appellant, Herald Publications Pvt. Ltd., a publisher of the daily newspaper 'Herald', was subjected to a search under Section 132 of the Income T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Properties under SAFEMA. Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Validly Triggers SAFEMA Proceedings Despite Non-Execution of Detention and Redemption of Confiscated Currency.

27 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Smt. Yamini S. Bhagwanji, challenged the forfeiture of three immovable properties and certain bank accounts under the Smugglers and Fo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case — HDPE Powder Found During Search Held Part of Recorded Stock, Not Unexplained Investment Under Section 69. Goods recorded in books of accounts as purchases and closing stock cannot be treated as unexplained investment under Section 69 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

17 Jan 2005

The appellant-assessee, Babulal C. Borana, a dealer in HDPE plastic powder, filed an appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case — HDPE Powder Stock Not Unexplained Investment Under Section 69. Assessee's books of accounts showing purchases and closing stock were accepted, and nature and source of investment were duly explained.

17 Jan 2005

The appeal was filed by the assessee, Babulal C. Borana, a dealer in HDPE plastic powder, under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the d...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)