Search Results for "Unconscionable Contract"

66 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 66 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Enhanced Share Valuation, Awards Interest at 6% Pre-Decree and 9% Post-Decree in Decades-Old Dispute. Balancing Equity and Commercial Realities: SC Modifies Interest Rates in Rajasthan State Mines Share Acquisition Case

Valuation of Shares – The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court’s valuation of shares at ₹640 per share, rejecting the State’s objections. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal, Upholds Liquidated Damages Clause in Employment Contract. Clause requiring employee to pay Rs. 2 lakhs for resigning before three years held valid under Section 27 of Indian Contract Act, 1872, and not opposed to public policy.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Vijaya Bank and another against the judgment of the High Court of Karnataka which had quashed clause 11...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Part in Flat Purchase Dispute — Earnest Money Refund with Daily Fine and Compound Interest Upheld but Reduced. Clause 4 of Agreement for Construction and Sale Held to Be a Valid Forfeiture Clause, Not a Penalty, Under Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

The plaintiff, Dr. Jagdish J.N. Counte, entered into a written agreement dated 13.4.96 with the defendant, M/s. Carl Estate Private Limited, for the p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows PWD's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Road Construction Contract Dispute. Court Upholds Damages Beyond 1% Cap Due to Contractor's Abandonment but Reduces Interest Rate from 18% to 9% Simple.

The case arises from three arbitration petitions filed by the Public Works Department (PWD) of Maharashtra under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator's Award in Contract Dispute Over Final Bill Claims. Court Held That Arbitrator's Consideration of Vitiating Factors and Contract Clauses Was Permissible Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Despite Prohibition on Further Claims in Clauses 65 and 65A.

The dispute arose from a contract dated 02.07.2001 for repair works, with time extended to 19.01.2002. The respondent contractor submitted a final bil...