Search Results for "Tiger Skin"

4 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Wildlife Protection Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under Sections 39 and 40 of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession of animal articles beyond reasonable doubt.

The petitioner, Boraiah @ Boregowda @ Papanna, was originally acquitted by the trial court (Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.) & JMFC, Gundlupet) in C.C.No.494/200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Wildlife Product Seizure Case but Reduces Sentence from 6 to 3 Years. Conscious possession of tiger parts established; discrepancies in trap proceedings not sufficient to create doubt; sentence reduced considering young age and time served.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals challenging the conviction of Rajesh and Makbool Ahmed under the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 for illegal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Wildlife Crime Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under Sections 9 and 39(a) of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 and Section 379 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession or sale of tiger skin beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to a criminal revision petition filed by two petitioners (accused Nos. 3 and 4) challenging their conviction under Sections 9 and 39...