Search Results for "Tempo"

320 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 320 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Deemed Passenger for Hire, Not Gratuitous Passenger. Negligence of Tempo Driver Proved; Insurance Company Held Liable to Indemnify Owner Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The present appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 30.07.2009 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.), Panchmahals at Godhra, in M....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim for Amputation of Leg - Compensation Enhanced for Future Loss of Income and Pain and Suffering. Housewife's Notional Income Assessed at Rs.3,000 per Month with Multiplier of 16 for Permanent Disability.

The appellant, Gajaraben Rameshbhai Padhiyar (Parmar), filed a first appeal before the Gujarat High Court against the judgment and award dated 23.01.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Death of Two Persons in Tempo Accident. Held that the insurance company failed to prove breach of policy conditions and that the driver's license was valid at the time of accident.

The present appeals arise out of two separate claim petitions filed by the legal representatives of two deceased persons who died in a motor vehicle a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Death of Two Persons in Motor Accident. The court applied multiplier method with future prospects and increased interest rate to 12%.

The case involves four appeals arising from a motor accident that occurred on 22.12.2013, when a Tempo Trax bearing registration No.KA-37/9942 collide...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — No Contributory Negligence by Deceased Driver. Insurer Failed to Prove Negligence of Deceased in Head-On Collision with Tempo; MACT Award of Rs. 71,36,917 Upheld.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the respondents (claimants) being the legal heirs of Sudam Auti, who died in a head-on collision ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Appeals by Insurance Company and Owner in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Driver Upheld. Compensation Award of Rs. 7,50,000 Confirmed Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the legal representatives of Balkrushna Khandagale, who died in a collision between a motorcycle ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Hit-and-Run Case Due to Lack of Evidence Identifying Driver. Conviction under Sections 279, 304A IPC and Motor Vehicles Act Quashed as Prosecution Failed to Prove Applicant Was Driving the Offending Tempo.

The applicant, Ramnath Yashwant Gholap, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate (First Class), Ashti, for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Deceased Owner of Goods Travelling in Goods Vehicle Not a Gratuitous Passenger. Insurer Liable Under Section 110A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 for Death of Goods Owner in Collision Between Tempo and Truck.

The case arises from a motor accident on 15th April 1988 at Swargate, Pune, where the deceased Balkrishna was waiting with his luggage. The driver of ...