Search Results for "Telegraph Act Interception"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Telegraph Act Interception"

7 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment on Writ Petitions Challenging Permanent Lok Adalat Order in Banking Fraud Compensation Claim — Jurisdiction of Permanent Lok Adalat Under Section 22C of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 Raised Due to Alleged Criminal Misconduct by Third Parties. The dispute involved unauthorised online transfers from a bank account enabled by a duplicate SIM issued without consent, leading to claims for compensation and questions on the Lok Adalat's adjudicatory powers in fraud cases.

1 Jun 2026

The High Court of Karnataka heard two connected writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, challenging the order of the Perm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Interception Orders in CBI Corruption Case for Lack of Reasons and Public Emergency. Orders under Section 5(2) of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 set aside as they merely recited statutory language without recording cogent reasons demonstrating public safety or public emergency.

6 Sep 2024

The petitioner, Shyamalendu Kumar Das, a Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (Central), challenged two orders dated 9 March 2018 and 17 March 2018 passed...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Former Intelligence Commissioner in Leak Case — Lack of Sanction and Limitation Bar. Court holds that prosecution under Official Secrets Act and other statutes requires prior sanction under Section 197 CrPC and Section 170 of Maharashtra Police Act, and is barred by limitation under Section 468 CrPC.

15 Dec 2021

The petitioner, Rashmi Uday Shukla, was the Commissioner of the State Intelligence Department, Maharashtra. On 26 March 2021, an FIR was registered at...

High Court

High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Bharti Airtel Officials in Private Complaint for Lack of Vicarious Liability and Abuse of Process. The court held that continuing proceedings against directors and officers without specific allegations of their involvement would be an abuse of process under Section 482 CrPC.

11 Dec 2019

The petitioners, who are the Chairman, Managing Director, CEO, and Nodal Officer of Bharti Airtel Ltd., filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under UAPA for Conspiracy to Commit Terrorist Acts — Acquittal for Attempt to Commit Offences Under IPC and UAPA. Appellants convicted under Section 18 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 for conspiracy to commit terrorist acts, but acquitted of attempt and other charges due to lack of evidence.

3 Dec 2018

The case involves an appeal by Abdul Latif Abdul Rashid Shaikh @ Guddu and Riaz Ali Abubakar Shaikh @ Riyan against their conviction under Section 18 ...

High Court

State of Karnataka Appeals Against Acquittal of Telgi and Others in Fake Stamp Paper Case, High Court Framing Issues Under KCOC and Prevention of Corruption Acts. The case pertains to the challenge of trial court acquittal of organised crime charges involving counterfeit stamp papers and corruption of public servants, with the High Court examining whether the material on record justified the acquittal under the Karnataka Control of Organised Crimes Act, 2000.

3 Aug 2017

The State of Karnataka, through the Central Bureau of Investigation, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(2) and (3) of the Criminal Procedure Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging SEBI's Power to Call Call Data Records. SEBI's Investigative Powers Under Section 11 of SEBI Act, 1992 Include Access to CDRs, and Such Access Does Not Violate Right to Privacy.

22 Apr 2014

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the Indian Council of Investors challenging the Securities and Exchange Bo...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)