Search Results for "Tax Avoidance"

92 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 92 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Case on Dividend Distribution Tax Rate. DDT under Section 115-O is a tax on the company, not on shareholders, and the India-UK DTAA does not provide a lower rate for DDT.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a batch of seven appeals filed by Foseco India Ltd. under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging a comm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Trade Circulars Restricting CST Exemption to Registered Dealers. State Government Cannot Grant Exemption for Inter-State Sales to Unregistered Dealers Under Section 8(5) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 After 2002 Amendment.

The petitioners, Prism Cement Limited and its shareholder/director, filed a writ petition challenging three trade circulars issued by the Commissioner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Taxpayer Against Non-Processing of Income Tax Returns and Refund Claims. Mandamus Issued to Process Returns Under Section 143(1) Within Four Weeks, Subject to Section 143(1D) and Section 241A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, Vodafone Idea Ltd. (formerly Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd), is a telecommunications company that filed income tax returns for Assessmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Income Tax Matter Involving India-China DTAA Interpretation. Petitioner's Claim for NIL Withholding Tax Certificate Rejected Due to Pending Assessments and Previous Tax Determinations Under Section 197 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The dispute involved a Chinese company, Petitioner, which provided technical services to its Indian subsidiary, Benteler India Private Limited, under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Arrangement for Amalgamation of Five Transferor Companies with Unichem Laboratories Limited. Scheme held fair and reasonable under Sections 391-394 of Companies Act, 1956, despite shareholder objection.

The judgment concerns five Company Scheme Petitions filed under Sections 391 to 394 read with Sections 80, 100 to 103 of the Companies Act, 1956, seek...