Search Results for "Tahsildar Office"

1036 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1036 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Patwari in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sanjay Ramdas Kalmegh, was a Patwari at Pimpri-Deshmukh, Maharashtra. The complainant, Raghunath Tandale, owned agricultural land and a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Satish Ganpatrao Suryavanshi, was convicted by the Special Judge, Ichalkaranji, for offences under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Revenue Tribunal's Order in Tenancy Act Land Transfer Dispute. Petitioner failed to prove that respondent No.4 was not an agriculturist under Section 63 of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The petitioner, Nilesh Ravindra Varode, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Collector's Order Dismissing No Confidence Motion Dispute for Lack of Hearing. Petitioner's Application Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 Dismissed Without Affording Opportunity of Hearing, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Sunil Bhaskar Katkar, was elected as Sarpanch of Belati Grampanchayat in June 2015. On 3rd March 2018, respondent nos.1 to 6 filed an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch for Non-Compliance with Section 35(1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. Notice Issued by Tahsildar Without Proper Verification of Signatures and Without Giving Opportunity to Sarpanch to Explain Grounds.

The petitioner, Shri Raviraj Sambhajirao Nimbalkar, was elected as Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Kalnakwadi, Kolhapur. On 21st November 2017, some members...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench Adjudicates Regular First Appeal in Partition Suit Concerning Re-granted Walikaraki Lands Under KVOA Act. Core Issue: Junior Family Members’ Entitlement to Share in Lands Re-granted to Senior Branch After Abolition of Village Office.

The dispute pertains to a suit for partition filed by the respondents/plaintiffs against the appellants/defendants regarding agricultural lands and ho...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch. Notice Signed by Majority of Total Members of Grampanchayat is Valid Under Section 55(2) of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Shivkant Bangar and Gavlan Tekale challenging the no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gr...