Search Results for "Suspicious circumstances"

665 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 665 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Decree Granting Letters of Administration in Will Dispute. Will Proved in Accordance with Law, No Suspicious Circumstances Found Under Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 and Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The case involves a dispute over the estate of E. Srinivasa Pillai, who died on 19th January 1978. The plaintiffs, C. Saradambal (widow of the testato...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Petition in Testamentary Suit No. 13 of 1994 — Will Not Proved Due to Suspicious Circumstances. Propounders Failed to Discharge Burden of Proving Due Execution Under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The plaintiffs, Harish Vithal Kulkarni and Shivanand Vishwanath Warty, claiming to be executors under a Will dated 11th October, 1991 of Mahadeo Sabni...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Partition Suit and Upholds Wills in Family Property Dispute. Wills and Codicils Executed by Testator and Testatrix Found Valid, No Undue Influence or Lack of Testamentary Capacity Established.

The judgment concerns a family dispute over the estate of Chimanlal Chinai and his wife Shardaben Chinai. The plaintiffs, legal heirs of Dinkar Chinai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Grant of Probate in Will Dispute. Court Holds That Certified Copy of Will is Admissible as Secondary Evidence and Due Execution Proved Under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 16.08.2024 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Madras High Court in T.O.S.No.21 of 2020, granti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Case Due to High Court Exceeding Jurisdiction Under Section 100 CPC. High Court's Reappreciation of Evidence in Second Appeal Quashed as Beyond Scope of Substantial Question of Law.

The present appeal arises from a property dispute between the original plaintiff (respondent) and the original defendants (appellants) concerning the ...