Search Results for "Suspension Revocation"

98 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 98 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Suspension Order in Lokayukta Trap Case — Petitioner Deemed Suspended Under Rule 10(2)(b) of Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957 for Custody Over 48 Hours, But Suspension Revoked After Release on Bail.

The petitioner, Sri. Basavaraj S/o. Pundalikappa Nirugi, aged about 59 years, was working as a Revenue Officer in the City Municipal Council, Bagalkot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Madras Considers Plea for Reinstatement and Payment of Subsistence Allowance Following Suspension of Court Employee. Petitioner Alleges Non-Payment of Allowance for Over Seven Years Despite Compliance with Fundamental Rule 53(2).

The petitioner was appointed as Office Assistant in the Tamil Nadu judicial service on 12.12.2012 and later promoted to Record Clerk. While working in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Retired Ordnance Factory Labourer Seeking Full Salary for Suspension Period Following Acquittal — Period of Suspension Must Be Treated as Duty for All Purposes Under Fundamental Rule 54-B(3) When Acquittal Is Based on Full Trial on Merits.

The petitioner, Gopal S/o Sitaram Bairisal, a retired labourer from Ordnance Factory, Ambazari, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Cen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Suspension Order and Non-Payment of Subsistence Allowance in Service Matter. Suspension order without subsistence allowance held illegal and violative of principles of natural justice.

The petitioner, Shri Sambhaji Maruti Gutte, was appointed as a Peon in the Residential Deaf and Dumb School, Hingoli (respondent no.5) in 1992. The sc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds CAT Order Reinstating Suspended Police Officer Due to Non-Review Under Rule 3(8) of All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969. Continued suspension beyond 90 days without mandatory review renders suspension illegal and without authority of law.

The State of Maharashtra and the Director General of Police filed a Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Suspension Orders of Municipal Officers Under Section 56(1)(b) of BPMC Act for Disciplinary Enquiry. The court overruled a previous Division Bench decision that had restricted the provision to criminal proceedings, holding that suspension pending enquiry into charges is valid.

The case involved a writ petition filed by five officers of the Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation challenging their suspension orders. The petitioners...