Search Results for "Supervisory functions"

375 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 375 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Appropriate Government for ARAI held to be State Government – Petitioner not deemed a ‘workman’ under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – Petition dismissed

The petitioner’s supervisory and managerial functions disqualified him from being classified as a ‘workman.’ The nature of duties and responsib...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Workman Status in Industrial Dispute. Tribunal's finding that employee was a 'workman' under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 upheld as not perverse.

The petitioner, M/s. Procter and Gamble Health Limited (formerly Merck Ltd.), challenged an award dated 28.02.2020 passed by the Industrial Tribunal a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages. Termination of workman without compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 held illegal, and reinstatement with full back wages upheld.

The petitioner, M/s. Carona Ltd., challenged the judgment and order of the Labour Court, Mumbai, dated 30th September 2016, in Reference (IDA) No. 156...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Considers Writ Petition by Employer Bank Against Industrial Tribunal Award Directing Reinstatement — Workman Status Under Industrial Disputes Act Contested. Court Examines Whether Termination Based on Settlement Clause Was Justified and Whether Back Wages Should Be Awarded.

The case involves a writ petition filed by The Goa Urban Co-op. Bank Ltd. challenging an award dated 30.08.2003 passed by the Industrial Tribunal, whi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Reinstatement with Back Wages Granted for Illegal Termination. Workman's Dismissal Without Proper Enquiry and Without Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Held Illegal.

The appellant, Chandrashekhar Chintaman Vaidya, was employed by the respondent, National Organic Chemical Industries Ltd., as a workman. He was dismis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Finding that Senior Engineer and Engineering Assistant are Not Workmen under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Petitioners' Complaints under MRTU & PULP Act Dismissed as Not Maintainable Due to Lack of Workman Status.

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions challenging the Labour Court's orders dated 23rd July 1999, which held that the Petitioners were no...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Bank Management in Dispute Over Supervisory Allowance Claim by Head Cashiers Under Sastry and Desai Awards. Labour Court's Order Granting Special Allowance Set Aside as Head Cashiers' Duties Were Primarily Clerical and Any Supervisory Work Was Incidental.

The dispute arose between the Management of State Bank of Hyderabad and its head cashiers, who were respondents, regarding their claim to a special al...