Search Results for "Suo motu extension"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Suo motu extension"

218 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 218 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeals in Income Tax Special Audit Time Extension Case. Assessing Officer Had Suo Motu Power to Extend Time Under Section 142(2C) Even Before 2008 Amendment.

26 Mar 2019

The case involves a batch of appeals by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the judgment of the Delhi High Court, which had dismissed the Revenue's...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Ceiling Act Revision Order — Landlord's Surplus Land Declaration Confirmed. Suo Motu Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Valid Despite Lack of Notice to Landlord.

2 Aug 2005

The appellant, Vilas Ratanchand Shah, filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the judgment dated 31st August 1998 in Writ Petition No.2475 of 1980, whic...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Disposes of Miscellaneous Application in Suo Motu Limitation Extension Case with Final Directions. The Court excluded the period from 15.03.2020 to 02.10.2021 in computing limitation under general and special laws, providing a 90-day period from 03.10.2021 for cases where limitation expired, and applied this to specific statutes including Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

23 Sep 2021

The Supreme Court of India, in suo motu proceedings initiated due to the COVID-19 pandemic, addressed the extension of limitation periods for legal pr...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Examines Whether Amended Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Operates Retrospectively. The Correctness of the Division Bench Decision in Vaishali Satish Ganorkar Holding Prospective Operation is Challenged, with Parties Citing Supreme Court Precedents.

9 Jun 2014

This matter comprises a batch of second appeals before the Bombay High Court, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, presided over by Justice R.G. Ketkar. The ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Endorsement Rejecting SVLDRS Payment, Holds Limitation Extended Due to COVID-19 Supreme Court Orders. Payment made on 30.09.2020 under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, beyond notified deadline of 30.06.2020, held valid as Supreme Court took suo motu cognizance and extended limitation for all proceedings from 15.03.2020 till further orders.

20 Aug 2024

The writ petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of an endorsement dated 13.01.2022 and a directio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revision Condonation Delay in Himachal Pradesh VAT Act — Section 5 Limitation Act Applicable. High Court's revisional power under Section 48 of the HP VAT Act, 2005 includes power to condone delay under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 as Section 29(2) applies unless expressly excluded.

25 Oct 2019

The Supreme Court considered appeals against the Himachal Pradesh High Court's judgment dated 19.11.2018, which refused to condone delay in filing rev...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Amendment of Section 88 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Insertion of Third and Fourth Provisos Permitting Government Extension of Time for Inquiry Against Delinquent Promoters is Constitutionally Valid and Not Retrospective Penal Legislation.

2 May 2019

The dispute arose from an inquiry under Section 88(1) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 initiated against former directors of the Ma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Clarifies Maintainability of Revision Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 — Interlocutory Procedural Orders Not Revisable. Division Bench Holds That Revision Under Section 34(4) is Limited to Orders Affecting Rights or Liabilities of Parties and Does Not Extend to Purely Procedural Orders Passed Under CPC.

21 Jan 2013

The Bombay High Court was seized of three writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging orders passed by the Court of Small Causes ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Matter — Assessment of Compensation and Allied Issues. Dispute Involves Quantum of Compensation and Locus Standi of Acquiring Body Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

1 Jan 2026

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging ITAT Order Rejecting Rectification Application as Time-Barred. Section 254(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961 Does Not Confer Power to Condon Delay Beyond Six Months.

25 Feb 2025

The petitioner, Leena Power Tech Engineers Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 03 November 2023, which di...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)