Search Results for "Summary General Court Martial"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Summary General Court Martial"

25 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 25 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Air Force Officer in Administrative Action Under Air Force Act, 1950. Administrative dismissal under Section 19 read with Rule 16 of Air Force Rules, 1969 is not barred by the three-year limitation period for court-martial under Section 121 of the Air Force Act, 1950, as limitation applies only to trial by court-martial, not to administrative proceedings.

15 Apr 2026

The dispute involved a former Indian Air Force officer challenging his dismissal from service under the Air Force Act, 1950. The appellant, commission...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Army Personnel Dismissed for Overstaying Leave on Compassionate Grounds. Held that absence due to wife's illness with medical certificates constituted sufficient cause under Section 39(b) of the Army Act, 1950.

1 Dec 2023

The appellant, Ex Sepoy Madan Prasad, was enrolled in the Army Service Corps on 4th January 1983 as a Mechanical Transport Driver. In 1998, he was gra...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal in BSF Disciplinary Case — Commandant's Power to Order Additional Record of Evidence Upheld. The Court held that the Commandant had jurisdiction to direct preparation of additional RoE under Rule 51 of BSF Rules, 1969, and that reasons for conviction need not be recorded by SSFC or appellate authority under Section 117(2) of BSF Act, 1968.

3 Dec 2021

The Union of India and officials of the Border Security Force appealed against a judgment of the Calcutta High Court which quashed disciplinary procee...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Restores Cashiering Sentence in Army Court Martial Case for Outraging Modesty. Court Distinguishes Between Punishment Under Army Act and Pension Forfeiture Under Pension Regulations, Allowing Separate Proceedings for Pension Forfeiture While Restoring Original Sentence.

29 Jul 2020

The dispute originated from a complaint by two women patients against an Army Medical Corps officer alleging inappropriate touching during medical exa...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Airman in Theft Case, Sets Aside Tribunal Order. Air Force Act is a Special Law; Registration of FIR Not Mandatory for Court Martial Proceedings.

17 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Union of India against the order of the Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Lucknow, which had se...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Quashing of General Court Martial Against Retired Army Officer in Procurement Irregularities Case. No Prima Facie Case Made Out as Evidence Lacked Intent to Defraud and Actions Were Within Authority's Discretion.

27 Nov 2019

The Union of India appealed against the judgment of the Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, which quashed the order convening a General...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Armed Forces Tribunal's Order Setting Aside Conviction for Theft of Pistols in Army Court Martial — Confessional Statements Found Involuntary and Uncorroborated. Secondary Evidence Improperly Admitted Without Foundation, and Army Rule 58 Violated as Prosecution Case Not Put to Accused.

13 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals filed by the Union of India and the accused, thereby upholding the Armed Forces Tribunal's order dated Decembe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Summary Court Martial Case Due to Lack of Immediate Action Requirement. The Court held that the convening of a Summary Court Martial after a nine-month delay was contrary to Section 120 of the Army Act, 1950, and modified the punishment to discharge upon completion of fifteen years of service for pension eligibility.

8 Jul 2019

The appellant, Randhir Singh, was enrolled in the Indian Army on 29 October 1996 and was posted as Acting Lance Dafadar. On 11 August 2007, while on d...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal, Restores Dismissal of Army Sepoy for 302-Day Unauthorized Absence. Armed Forces Tribunal's Reduction of Punishment to Notional Service for Pension Held Erroneous.

11 Mar 2019

The respondent, Ex. No.6492086A Sep/Ash Kulbeer Singh, was enrolled in the Indian Army as a Sepoy on 25 April 1996. On 11 November 2007, he was posted...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Summary Court Martial Conviction for Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Evidence. Petitioner's thumb impression on payment vouchers not proved to be superimposed; conviction set aside.

6 Dec 2006

The petitioner, Major Anurag Pathak, was a Company Commander in the Indian Army. During his tenure in Bhutan (1993-96), he was later called upon to re...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)