Search Results for "Subordinate Offices Ministerial Staff Rules 1985"

7 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.

The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Withdrawal of Inter-Commissionerate Transfers for Inspectors Under Recruitment Rules 2016. Recruitment Rules Made Under Article 309 of the Constitution Prevail Over Executive Instructions, and ICTs Are Not Permissible as They Violate Separate Cadre Identity Under Rule 5.

The dispute arose from a batch of civil appeals filed by Inspectors of the Central Excise and Land Customs or Goods and Services Tax Administration, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Employee in Service Dispute — Appointment Upheld Despite Procedural Irregularities. Long-Standing Service and Confirmation Override Initial Termination Based on Reversion of Predecessor.

The appellant, Rana Pratap Singh, was appointed as Junior Accounts Clerk on 21.12.1990 after a selection process conducted by a duly constituted Selec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal Against Regularisation of Daily Wage Employee. Appointment Was on Daily Wage Basis, Not Regular Selection Under Rule 22 of Subordinate Offices Ministerial Staff (District Recruitment) Rules 1985.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court which had directed regularis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Promote Inspectors in Seniority Dispute Under Central Excise Recruitment Rules. Inter Se Seniority Must Be Fixed Based on 1959 and 1986 Office Memoranda with Quota Rule Compliance, Rejecting High Court's View on Vacancy Register Irrelevance.

The dispute originated from seniority fixation among Inspectors of Central Excise, recruited through direct recruitment and promotion under the Centra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Ineligibility for Judicial Appointment Due to Absence in Examination, Not Failure. Distinction between 'failure' and 'absence' in eligibility criteria for Civil Judge, Junior Division and JMFC under Maharashtra Judicial Service Rules.

The petitioner, Harsha d/o Bhikaji Gadekar, applied for the post of Civil Judge, Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate, First Class in the district ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Ineligibility for Judicial Appointment Due to Absence in Examination, Not Failure. Distinction between 'failure' and 'absence' in examination eligibility criteria for appointment as Civil Judge, Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate, First Class.

The petitioner, Harsha d/o Bhikaji Gadekar, applied for the post of Civil Judge, Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate, First Class (CJJD and JMFC) ...