Search Results for "Stock difference"

259 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 259 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds SEBI Order Against Corporate Giant in Futures Manipulation Case. The Court held that cornering 93.63% open interest through agents and dumping shares to depress settlement price constituted fraud under PFUTP Regulations.

The case involves appeals by Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) against orders of the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) which upheld SEBI's findings ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Excise Duty Case — Licensee Liable for Duty on Liquor Destroyed in Fire. Absolute liability under Rule 7(11)(a) of UP Bottling of Foreign Liquor Rules, 1969 and Rules 708/709 of UP Excise Manual; act of God no defense.

The case arises from a fire incident on 10.04.2003 at the godown of the respondent company, a distillery licensee, which destroyed 35,642 cases of Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Derivative Transaction Case. Exchange Traded Derivatives Held Not Speculative Under Section 43(5) of Income Tax Act, 1961, with Retrospective Application of Clause (d) of Proviso.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income-tax, Central-IV against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in favor of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) Set Aside as Surrender of Income Was to Buy Peace, Not Concealment. Stock Difference Detected During Survey Was Not Deliberately Concealed and Related to Earlier Assessment Year.

The appellant-assessee, a partnership firm running a bar and restaurant, was subjected to a survey under Section 133A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Exchange Dispute Due to Limitation. Claim Filed Beyond Six-Month Period Under BSE Regulation 252(2) Is Barred.

The petitioner, Kalpana Munish Bumb, was a constituent of respondent no. 1, a trading member of the Bombay Stock Exchange. The last transaction betwee...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute Over Unreturned Shares. Concurrent findings of arbitral tribunals that stock broker failed to return client's shares and dividends upheld under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Manoj Javeri Stock Broking Pvt. Ltd., a member of the Bombay Stock Exchange, challenged an arbitral award and appellate award dated 17...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Civil Court's Dismissal of Suit on Ground of Arbitration Clause Under Stock Exchange Bye-laws. Transaction Not Through Stock Exchange Member, Hence Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Entertain Recovery Suit.

The petitioners, M/s. Prashant Commercial, filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 23 lakhs against the respondent, Rajratan R. Mohta, claiming that the amou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Upholds Arbitral Award Holding Stockbroker Liable for Unauthorized Trades by Agent. Broker Failed to Prove Client Authorization for Disputed Trades, Resulting in Compensation of Rs.14,37,200/- to Client.

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by IIFL Capital Services Limited (formerly IIFL Secu...