Search Results for "Stock Exchange Byelaws"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Stock Exchange Byelaws"

59 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 59 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Expulsion of Trading Member for Violating Gross Exposure Limits and Failing to Maintain Capital Adequacy. Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Section 22F - Appeal against Securities Appellate Tribunal order upholding expulsion from National Stock Exchange membership.

20 Nov 2020

The appellant, Rusoday Securities Ltd., was a trading member of the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. (NSE) since November 1994 and gave an undert...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Share Trading Dispute — Upholds Arbitrators' Findings on Contract Notes and Liability. Court holds that failure to object to contract notes within reasonable time amounts to acceptance under NSE Bye-Laws and that arbitral tribunal's findings on facts and law are not open to challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

18 Jan 2014

The petitioner, Harinarayan Bajaj, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award date...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute Over Unreturned Shares. Concurrent findings of arbitral tribunals that stock broker failed to return client's shares and dividends upheld under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Jan 2017

The petitioner, Manoj Javeri Stock Broking Pvt. Ltd., a member of the Bombay Stock Exchange, challenged an arbitral award and appellate award dated 17...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds SEBI Order Against Corporate Giant in Futures Manipulation Case. The Court held that cornering 93.63% open interest through agents and dumping shares to depress settlement price constituted fraud under PFUTP Regulations.

29 May 2026

The case involves appeals by Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) against orders of the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) which upheld SEBI's findings ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute Over Unreturned Shares. Concurrent findings of arbitral tribunals that stock broker failed to return client's shares and dividends upheld under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Jan 2017

The petitioner, Manoj Javeri Stock Broking Pvt. Ltd., a member of the Bombay Stock Exchange, challenged an arbitral award and appellate award dated 17...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Sub-Brokerage Dispute — Upholds Appellate Bench Decision of Bombay Stock Exchange. Court holds that findings of fact by arbitral tribunal and appellate bench are not liable to be interfered with under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 unless perverse or contrary to public policy.

9 Oct 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Actal, a sole proprietorship concern engaged in trading in shares, insurance, bonds, mutual funds, etc., was associated with the ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Broker's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Client Dispute Over Delay Paying Charges. Unilateral Charging of 2% Daily Interest Without Specific Agreement or Proof of Loss Held Unconscionable and Not Enforceable Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

7 Mar 2012

The case involves a dispute between Sharekhan Limited, a trading member/broker of the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE), and Nita Thakkar, a client. The bro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Share Purchase Dispute for Patent Illegality and Perversity. The court found that the arbitrator's interpretation of a condition subsequent in a share purchase agreement was patently illegal and perverse, warranting interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

27 Mar 2019

The case involves a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to an arbitral award arising from a share purchase agree...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Share Transaction Dispute — Limitation Period Governed by Limitation Act, 1963 Pursuant to SEBI Circulars. The court held that SEBI circulars override stock exchange byelaws, and the claim filed within three years under the Limitation Act was not barred.

24 Jul 2013

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge dismissing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Violation of Mandatory Time Limit Under NSEIL Byelaws. Award passed beyond six-month period without extension provision is illegal and liable to be quashed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

17 Jul 2012

The Petitioner, a constituent, challenged an arbitral award dated 19 September 2009 passed by a panel of Arbitrators appointed under the Byelaws, Rule...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)