Search Results for "States Reorganisation Act, 1956"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "States Reorganisation Act, 1956"

61 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 61 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of States Reorganisation Act, 1956: Formation of Composite Bombay State Without Fresh Reference to State Legislature Upheld. Modification of Bill by Parliament Does Not Require Second Reference Under Proviso to Article 3 of the Constitution of India.

28 Aug 1959

The case arose from a challenge to the constitutional validity of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956. Following the report of the States Reorganisati...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Territorial Limitation of Sales Tax Exemption After State Bifurcation. Benefit of exemption/deferment granted under unified Madhya Pradesh is confined to the state where the industrial unit is located and does not extend to inter-state transactions with the other successor state.

9 Jul 2019

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals arising from the bifurcation of the State of Madhya Pradesh into the reorganised State of Madhya Prade...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Former District and Sessions Judge Against Substantive Appointment as Civil Judge Upon Integration of Bikaner into Rajasthan. Held, Contracts of Service with Erstwhile State Cease on Merger, and New State May Impose Own Terms Without Violating Article 311 of Constitution.

28 Nov 1957

The case arose from the integration of the princely state of Bikaner into the new State of Rajasthan following India's independence. The appellant, Ra...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Challenge to Validity of Central Government Order Prescribing Notional Depreciation for Tax-Exempt Assessees in Merged States. The Order Required Depreciation to be Notionally Computed for Exemption Periods Under Section 6 of the Taxation Laws (Extension to Merged States and Amendment) Act, 1949.

20 Oct 1967

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court adjudicates legal status of cooperative societies post-state reorganisation under Uttar Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 and Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002. The court examines interplay between statutory provisions and deeming clauses, requiring factual inquiry into multi-state status rather than automatic application.

10 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from the bifurcation of Uttar Pradesh and creation of Uttarakhand in 2000, affecting sugarcane growers cooperative societies whose a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appellants in Reservation Eligibility Dispute Under Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000. Appellants, originally from unified Bihar and residing in Jharkhand post-reorganisation, are entitled to Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe/Other Backward Classes reservation benefits in Jharkhand as ordinary residents, not migrants, under Articles 341(1) and 342(1) of the Constitution and Sections 23, 24, 73, 74 of Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000.

19 Aug 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard civil appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions challenging a High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 24th February...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Cooperative Society Jurisdiction Dispute — Multi-State Cooperative Society Status Not Triggered by State Reorganization Alone. Section 103 of the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002 requires the society's objects to extend beyond one state for deemed conversion, not merely its area of operation.

15 Dec 2025

The present appeals were filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh against the common judgment of the Allahabad High Court dated 26th September 2008, which ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Strikes Down Residential Requirement Rules for Telengana as Ultra Vires Article 16(3). Requirement of Residence for Public Employment Must Be Within Whole State, Not a Part Thereof, Invalidating Section 3 of the Public Employment (Requirement as to Residence) Act, 1957 and Rule 3 of Andhra Pradesh Rules.

28 Mar 1969

The dispute arose from appointments to certain posts in the Telengana area of Andhra Pradesh, which were reserved for domiciles of that region under r...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Executive Engineer Challenging Premature Retirement Under Bombay Civil Service Rules. Court Holds Saurashtra Rules Permitted Extension Only, Not Early Retirement, and Applying Bombay Rule Without Presidential Assent Varied Conditions to Disadvantage in Violation of Section 115(7) of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956.

9 Apr 1969

The case arose from an order of the Government of Gujarat prematurely retiring an Executive Engineer, about 53 years old, under the Bombay Civil Servi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Landowners' Appeal in Tenancy Act Challenge — Ninth Schedule Protection Upheld. Provisions of Maharashtra Act 1961 and Hyderabad Act 1950 Inserted in Ninth Schedule by Constitution (Seventeenth Amendment) Act 1964 Held Immune from Challenge Under Articles 19 and 31 of the Constitution.

15 Apr 1969

The case concerns a constitutional challenge to the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Re-enactment, Validation and Further Amendment) Act, 1...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)