Search Results for "Single Coparcener"

84 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 84 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Confirms Half Share to Plaintiff. Sale Deed Executed by Father Without Legal Necessity Held Not Binding on Daughter as Coparcener Under Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree in R.A. No. 207/1997, which confirmed the trial...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Daughter's Right to Coparcenary Share Under Amended Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act Despite Father's Death Before 1956 Act. Daughter Granted 1/4th Share in Suit Property as Amendment is Retrospective and Confers Coparcenary Rights from Birth.

The case involves a second appeal before the Bombay High Court challenging the judgments of the trial court and the first appellate court in a partiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Coparcenary Rights and Validity of Sale Deeds. The Court held that property inherited under Mitakshara law remains coparcenary, and a coparcener by birth can challenge alienations without legal necessity.

The present civil appeal arises from a property dispute concerning agricultural land in Village Khangarh, District Ferozepur, Punjab. The appellant, A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Partition Appeal in Hindu Succession Case — Daughter Entitled to Equal Share in Ancestral Property. Court holds that a married daughter is a coparcener under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and notional partition cannot defeat her rights.

The case involves a dispute over ancestral properties between a sister (respondent/plaintiff) and her brother's family (appellants/defendants). The re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Sets Aside Appellate Decree for Non-Compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC. Failure to Frame Points for Determination and Provide Reasons Renders Judgment Invalid.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the defendants against the judgment and decree of the 9th District Judge, Nagpur, in Regular Civil Appeal N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Order VII Rule 11 CPC Application in HUF Partition Suit — Suit Not Barred by Limitation as Cause of Action Arose on Alienation by Coparcener.

The present Civil Revision Application was filed by Defendant No.6, a third-party purchaser, challenging the rejection of his application under Order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment Application in Partition Suit Under Order I Rule 10 CPC. Petitioners Claiming to be Coparceners Held Necessary Parties for Effective Adjudication.

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Panhala, Kolhapur, rejecting their application under ...