Search Results for "Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules"

694 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 694 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Workman's Appeal on Distribution of Company Assets in Liquidation. Holds that Secured Creditors Have Pari Passu Charge Only Over Properties Specifically Charged, Not All Assets; Workmen Have Priority for Uncharged Properties Under Sections 529 and 529A Companies Act, 1956.

1 Aug 2026

The dispute arose from the winding up of U.M.I. Special Steel Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956. The company became sick, an...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Constitution Bench Examines Applicability of Part I of Arbitration Act, 1996 to Foreign-Seated Arbitrations. Reference Arises from Conflicting Views in Bhatia International and Venture Global Engineering.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court of India, by a reference order dated 16 January 2008, directed the listing of Civil Appeal No. 7019 of 2005 and connected matters be...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by State Bank of India in Jet Airways Insolvency Case — Holds Performance Bank Guarantee Cannot Be Adjusted Against Resolution Plan Payment and Non-Implementation Leads to Liquidation. The Court ruled that the SRA's failure to pay airport dues and employee dues constituted non-implementation of the Resolution Plan under Section 33(3) IBC, 2016, and the PBG cannot be set off against the first tranche payment.

13 Nov 2024

The case pertains to the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of Jet Airways (India) Limited, initiated by State Bank of India (SBI) under S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Enforces Foreign Arbitral Award in Helicopter Charter Dispute, Rejects Public Policy and Unjust Enrichment Challenges. Award directing payment of USD 6,563,700 and SGD 775,462.28 upheld as not contrary to Indian public policy under Section 48 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

17 Feb 2022

The petitioner, Aircon Beibars FZE, a UAE company engaged in aircraft leasing, and the respondent, Heligo Charters Private Limited, an Indian helicopt...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Award Against NAFED in Groundnut Export Dispute — Government Refusal Does Not Excuse Breach Under FOSFA Contract. The court held that a canalizing agency cannot rely on its own lack of permission as a force majeure event under Clause 14 of the FOSFA 20 Contract, and enforcement of the award is not against public policy despite procedural irregularities.

22 Apr 2020

The case involves a dispute between National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India (NAFED), a canalizing agency for the Government of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Disposes of News Broadcaster's Petition Challenging RBI Refusal to Accept Compounding Applications Under Foreign Exchange Management Act. The Court Examines the Compounding Process and the Validity of the 2017 Amendment to Rule 8(2) Barring Compounding When Section 37A Proceedings Are Contemplated.

26 Jun 2018

The petitioner, a public limited news broadcasting company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the actio...

High Court

KAHC010159832015_1

15 Dec 2017

...

High Court

KAHC010069912016_1

10 Nov 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

10 Nov 2016

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.

10 Nov 2016

The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)