(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No.2247 of 2024)
4 Aug 2026The complainant/appellant and the accused/respondent were acquainted and in December 2010, the complainant extended a hand loan of Rs.4,50,000 to the ...
Search Results for "Security Cheque"
646 result(s) found
Found 646 result(s)
High Court
Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Part in Foreign Award Enforcement Case, Remands for Consideration of Group of Companies Doctrine. The court held that the group of companies doctrine may bind a non-signatory to an arbitration agreement if there is commonality of interest and involvement in the contract.
27 Feb 2026The appellant, LSS Ocean Transport DMCC, a company incorporated in UAE, filed an appeal against an order dated 16.10.2023 in Arb.O.P.No.(Comm.Div.) 19...
- 40
High Court
Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Enforce Foreign Arbitral Award Against Non-Signatory. Group of Companies Doctrine Not Applicable Without Evidence of Mutual Intention to Bind Non-Signatory Under Sections 47-49 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
27 Feb 2026The appellant, LSS Ocean Transport DMCC, a UAE company, filed an appeal under Section 13(1) of the Commercial Courts Act and Section 50 of the Arbitra...
- 53
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Specific Averments of Vicarious Liability. Directors of a company cannot be held liable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, without specific allegations that they were in charge of and responsible for the conduct of the business at the time the offence was committed.
6 Oct 2023The case involves two criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of proceedings in C.C. No. ...
- 130
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petitions in Dishonour of Cheque Cases — Acquittal Set Aside Due to Non-Examination of Complainant and Improper Service of Notice. The court held that the appellate court erred in reversing the trial court's conviction without considering the mandatory presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and the validity of notice under Section 138.
8 Sep 2023The case involves two criminal revision petitions filed by M/s. Nazama Traders (petitioner) against M/s. Arihant Marketing (respondent) under Section ...
- 107
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reinstates Conviction Under Section 138. Partial Recovery Before Cheque Issuance Does Not Rebut Presumption Under Section 139 N.I. Act When Cheque Covers Balance Due.
19 Aug 2022The appeal arises from a judgment of the Sessions Court, Amravati, which set aside the conviction of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable I...
- 46
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Complaint Under Section 138 NI Act for Cheque Issued as Security — Endorsement on Cheque and Plaint Admission Confirm Security Purpose, No Legally Enforceable Debt Exists
3 Dec 2021The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Directors and Managing Director of R.L. Steels & Energy Limited, quashing the criminal complaint un...
- 728
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Cheque Dishonour Case — Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act Upheld. Accused Failed to Rebut Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt or Discharge, and Signature on Cheque Was Admitted.
15 Jun 2021The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by R. Hanumantharaya (the accused) against the judgment and order dated 02-01-2019 passed by the ...
- 96
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Blank Cheque Defence Rejected as Unsubstantiated. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands in favour of holder, and accused failed to rebut it by preponderance of probabilities.
11 Sep 2012The appellant, The Bagayatdar Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd., filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 agai...
- 61
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaint in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. The court held that the cause of action under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 arises only at the place where the cheque is presented and dishonoured, not at the place of issuance or the complainant's registered office.
3 Mar 2010The petitioner, Mrs. Preetha S. Babu, a resident of Ernakulam, Kerala, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution b...
- 79
