Search Results for "Section 88C"

15 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 15 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitration Award in Property Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Court upholds award based on joint family property partition and limitation, finding no patent illegality or perversity.

The petitioners, who were members of a joint family, challenged an arbitral award passed in a partition dispute. The award had been made by an arbitra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging MRT Order in Land Tenancy Dispute. MRT's Reversal of Collector's Order Set Aside for Ignoring Binding Supreme Court Order and Limitation Under Section 33B of Bombay Tenancy Act.

The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petitions challenging the order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) dated November 30, 2023. The MRT had ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Revenue Tribunal Order in Tenancy Revision Due to Gross Delay. Inordinate Delay of 34 Years in Challenging Mamlatdar's Order Cannot Be Condoned Without Proper Explanation Under Tenancy Act.

The State of Gujarat, through the Deputy Collector, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging an order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Petition in Land Possession Dispute Under Section 33B of Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Landlords' Certificate of Exemption Under Section 88C Upheld, Personal Cultivation Need Established.

The case involves a dispute between the petitioners, who are the heirs of the original tenant Kondiba Dnyanu Dongale, and the respondents, who are the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Tenancy Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Lower Authorities. Deemed Purchase Claim Under Section 32G of Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 Rejected Due to Lack of Evidence.

The case involves a dispute under the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. The Petitioners, Prabhu Anant Lungase and another, claimed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Eviction Petition and Dismisses Tenants' Petition in Agricultural Tenancy Dispute. Landlord's bonafide need for personal cultivation under Section 33B and default in rent under Section 25 of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 upheld.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions arising from agricultural tenancy disputes over the same suit property. The landlord, Tukaram Maruti Dubal, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Landlords' Petition Against MRT Order Remanding Purchase Price Fixation in Tenancy Dispute. MRT Exceeded Revisional Jurisdiction by Ordering De Novo Fixation Without Setting Aside ALT's Determination.

The petitioners, landlords of agricultural lands, challenged an order dated 27 April 1992 passed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) in a revisi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Tenancy Rights in Third Round of Litigation. Respondent's Adoption by Widow Before Tillers Day Confers Tenancy Rights Under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The case involves a long-standing dispute over tenancy rights in two agricultural lands (Survey No.37/4 and 38/6) in Village Kharshi, Satara District....