Search Results for "Section 85"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Section 85"

4 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Waqf Act Jurisdiction Dispute Regarding Suit for Permanent Injunction. Civil Court Jurisdiction for Injunction Suits Involving Waqf Property is Not Barred Under Section 85 of Waqf Act, 1995 When Dispute Does Not Involve Questions About Nature of Property.

28 Oct 2021

The dispute originated from a suit filed by the plaintiff (first respondent) against the defendant (appellant) and others for mandatory and permanent ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Revenue Authority's Order Granting Partition/Correction of Record of Rights Under Section 85 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 — Civil Suit Does Not Bar Summary Revenue Proceedings.

11 Sep 2018

The petitioner, Tarachand Goel, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 29-04-2015 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Nagpur Division, Na...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Tenancy Act Bar Case — Suit for Permanent Injunction Not Barred by Section 85 of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Courts Below Erred in Dismissing Suit Without Deciding Merits; Matter Remanded for Fresh Adjudication.

6 Jul 2015

The appellant, Pandurang Damodar Bhoir, filed a civil suit (Regular Civil Suit No. 155 of 2008) seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respond...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Plaintiff's claim for possession of agricultural land failed as the suit was held to be not maintainable in civil court due to bar under Section 85 of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

30 Nov -0001

The appellant, Siddhivinayak Audyogik Vasahat Maryadit, a society, filed two second appeals against the judgment and decree passed by the District Jud...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)