Search Results for "Section 77B"

10 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Consignee's Claim Against Railways for Non-declaration of Value Under Section 77B of Indian Railways Act, 1890. Failure to Declare Value of Package Exceeding Rs. 500 Bars Compensation as Wooden Case Constituted a Package Within Meaning of Section 77B.

A consignment of terrycotton cloth belonging to the petitioner firm was returned by a purchaser and booked at Bhagalpur railway station for delivery t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Discharge of Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 17-A of Prevention of Corruption Act. Amendment requiring prior approval for investigation applies to chargesheets filed after its commencement.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Anti Corruption Bureau, Nagpur, filed a criminal application challenging an ord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka considers power of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to direct fresh enquiry under Section 254 of Income Tax Act, 1961 in a buy-back taxation case. The court formulates the substantial question of law regarding suo motu directions leading to potential enhancement of tax liability.

The appeal before the High Court of Karnataka arose from an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) concerning the tax treatment of a buy-ba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Director in Cheating and Forgery Case. Court Held That Director's Role of Signing Documents and Attending Meetings Does Not Constitute Criminal Liability Without Specific Allegations of Dishonest Intent.

The applicant, Sandeep P. Jain, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in connection with C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Two Brothers in IT Act Case — IPC Offences Not Maintainable in Light of Section 67 of IT Act. Non-obstante clause in Section 81 of IT Act overrides IPC for offences involving obscene electronic material, following Sharat Babu Digumarti v. Government (NCT of Delhi).

The petitioners, two brothers, filed a criminal writ petition seeking quashing of FIR No. 86 of 2018 registered at Shahupuri Police Station, Kolhapur,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Perjury Application Against Petitioner in Rent Control Jurisdiction Dispute. Handwritten Interpolations in Balance Sheet Were Present in Trial Court Records, No Prima Facie Case of Forgery Established Under Section 340 CrPC.

The Supreme Court dismissed an application under Section 340 read with Section 195(1)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, seeking criminal procee...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Juvenile Board's Decision to Try Older Juvenile as Adult in Murder Case — Section 15 of Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 Requires Individualized Assessment of Physical and Mental Capacity to Commit Offence.

The case involves two juveniles, aged 17.5 years and 16.5 years, accused of murdering a three-and-half-year-old child. The Juvenile Justice Board, aft...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declaration and Lack of Medical Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove homicidal death beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Anand @ Bhausaheb Yuvraj Patil (accused No.1) and Smt. Lilabai Yuvraj Patil (accused No.2), were convicted by the Ad-hoc Sessions Judg...