Search Results for "Section 68-F"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Section 68-F"

6 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Defreezing of Bank Account in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 68-F(2) of NDPS Act, 1985. Petitioner's proprietary firm's bank account frozen by DRI in connection with husband's drug trafficking case; court holds that freezing order ceases to operate if not confirmed within 30 days.

27 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Jatinder Kaur Chilotra, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 3 December 202...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Defreezing of Bank Account in NDPS Case Due to Non-Confirmation of Freezing Order Within 30 Days Under Section 68-F(2) of NDPS Act, 1985. Petitioner's claim as proprietor not barred by earlier statement under Section 67.

27 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Jatinder Kaur Chilotra, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 3 December 202...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition to Defreeze Bank Accounts in NDPS Act Case — Petitioner Company Not an Accused Under Section 68F. Freezing order under Section 68F of NDPS Act, 1985 cannot be sustained against a company that is not an accused in the predicate offence.

5 Jan 2024

The petitioner, M/s. Ownpath Learning Private Limited, a registered startup under DPIIT, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Const...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Company's Challenge to SAFEMA Forfeiture Order for Property Linked to Narcotics Trafficking. Burden of Proof Under Section 7 SAFEMA Not Discharged by Claimant.

24 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Imperial Exim (India) Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 31 March 2011 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property, New ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Flat Under NDPS Act Due to Res Judicata and Delay. Earlier Dismissal of Writ Petitions and SLP Bar Re-agitation of Same Issues Under Article 226.

28 Sep 2012

The petitioners, Smt. Gulbanu Hassanali Rupani (aged 85) and Smt. Hasina S. Hemani, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constituti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes One-Year Renewal of Stage Carriage Permits Under Section 58 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. Renewal Period Must Conform to Original Permit Period, Minimum Three Years.

6 Nov 1959

The case originated from the expiry of stage carriage permits held by the petitioners on March 31, 1958. They applied for renewal before the Regional ...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)