Search Results for "Section 430 Companies Act"

36 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 36 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Hawking Activities on Footpaths in Nariman Point and Churchgate Areas. Court Holds That Hawking Is a Fundamental Right Under Article 19(1)(g) Subject to Reasonable Restrictions, and That Municipal Authorities Have Discretion to Designate Hawking Zones.

The petitioners, a group of residents and welfare associations from Nariman Point and Churchgate areas in Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Order Allowing Workmen's Application for Payment of Gratuity and Other Dues from Company Assets. Workmen's dues have priority under Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956, and Official Liquidator must pay from sale proceeds.

The case involves two appeals filed by Grand View Estates Private Limited and Forbes & Company Limited against an order of the Company Court allowing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Trust Land Exchange Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Oral Exchange Agreement from 1956 Not Proved; Possession Not Established; Suit for Declaration and Injunction Dismissed.

The appellant, Shree Nootan Kelavani Mandal, a trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, filed a Second Appeal under Section 100 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Deduction Under Section 80IA for Income from Operation and Maintenance of Software Technology Park. The Court held that income from leasing out property with amenities constitutes business income eligible for deduction under Section 80IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, M/s. Tidel Park Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Trib...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favor of Dealer in Termination Dispute. No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as Arbitrator's Findings Were Plausible and Not Perverse.

The Petitioner, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (HPCL), a government oil company, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concil...