Search Results for "Section 411 IPC"

140 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 140 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Set Aside Conviction Under Sections 120B and 411 IPC — Ordered Return of Seized Gold Bars to Appellant. Acquittal of Co-Accused Upheld — Failure to Prove Seized Gold Was Stolen Property — Reasonable Doubt Favored Accused

Constitution of India (COI) — Article 21 — Right to Fair Trial — Burden of Proof on Prosecution — Chain of Circumstances Must Be Complete. In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Dacoity Stolen Property Case Due to Lack of Proof of Knowledge. Conviction under Sections 411 and 412 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish that appellants knew or had reason to believe the recovered ornaments were proceeds of dacoity.

The appellants, Ashok Suryabhan Kale and Bhausaheb Suryabhan Kale, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, for offences under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Section 411 IPC Case for Lack of Proof of Guilty Knowledge. Conviction for Dishonest Receiving of Stolen Property Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish That Appellant Knew Property Was Stolen.

The appellant, Sharad Mahadev More, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, for an offence punishable under Section 411 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Dacoity Case Due to Lack of Identification and Conspiracy Evidence. Acquittal of Accused Under Sections 120-B, 395, 397 IPC Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 11th May 1987 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, whereby ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under Bombay Police Act for Possession of Stolen Property — Recovery Based on Co-accused's Disclosure Statement Not Admissible Against Petitioner Under Section 27 of Evidence Act.

The petitioner, Satish Shivajirao Deshmukh, a jeweller, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Nanded, under Section 411 of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused Under Section 302 IPC While Affirming Acquittal of Co-accused in Murder Case. Evidence Established Fatal Injuries Inflicted by One Accused with Kulhari, While Other Only Used Lathi, Not Proving Common Intention for Murder Under Section 34 IPC.

The dispute arose from an incident on 09.01.1999 involving four accused persons—Mohd. Yunus (A1), Mohd. Jamil (A2), Ghasita (A3), and Akhtar Hussain...