Search Results for "Section 4(1)(b)"

14 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 14 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court Order Holding Anticipatory Bail Maintainable Despite Custody in Another Case. Person in Custody Cannot Apprehend Arrest and Thus Cannot Seek Pre-Arrest Bail Under Section 438 CrPC.

The Supreme Court considered the question of whether an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arrest in Hoarding Collapse Case — Arrest Held Valid Under Section 41 CrPC. Court finds no violation of D.K. Basu guidelines as grounds of arrest were communicated in writing and arrest memo was served.

The case arises from a catastrophic incident on 13/05/2024 when a large hoarding (64x50 meters, 120 ft high) collapsed on a petrol pump in Mumbai duri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petitions Declaring Lapse of Land Acquisition Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Acquisition for Karwar Port Lapsed Due to Non-Payment of Compensation and Non-Taking of Possession.

The petitioners, fishermen residing in Goudawada, Baitkhol, Karwar, Uttara Kannada, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitutio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Letters Patent Appeal Against Charity Commissioner's Enquiry Order in Trust Misappropriation Case. Res Judicata Not Applicable as Earlier Enquiry Was Not a Proper Enquiry on Merits.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by Rustomjee Kerawalla Foundation against an order of the Learned Single Judge dated 31 July 2012. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Retrospective Amendment to Sales Tax Incentive Scheme. Retrospective Operation of Section 41B of Bombay Sales Tax Act and Rule 31AA Upheld as Valid and Not Violative of Vested Rights.

The petitioners, M/s. Prasad Power Control Pvt. Limited and its director, challenged the constitutional validity of Section 41B of the Bombay Sales Ta...