Search Results for "Section 394 IPC"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Section 394 IPC"

189 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 189 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Robbery Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Non-Applicability of Section 397 IPC. The Court held that Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, applies only to the offender who uses a deadly weapon, and the benefit of acquittal of a co-accused extends to other accused when allegations are indivisible, leading to acquittal based on unreliable identification and suspicious FIR.

29 Oct 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard criminal appeals filed by two appellants, Ganesan and Shanmugam, challenging their conviction under Section 397 of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Negligent Truck Driver. Court Sets Aside Finding of Contributory Negligence and Applies Correct Multiplier and Future Prospects Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

31 Oct 2018

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the wife and minor children of Kishor Pawar, who died in a vehicular accident on 12 Marc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Modifies Conviction in Robbery Case: Offence of Robbery Under Section 390 IPC Not Made Out as No Grievous Hurt Caused or Attempted. The court held that for theft to become robbery, the offender must cause or attempt to cause death or grievous hurt, and mere tying up does not suffice.

18 Oct 2011

The appellant, Dudhnath @ Ajay Baburam Harijan, was convicted by the 1st Ad-hoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Bombay, for offences under Sections 394, 450...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision and Appeals in Forest Officer Assault Case — Acquittal Upheld Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Allegations of Assault and Wrongful Confinement by Forest Officers Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 323, 342, 504 IPC.

8 Apr 2022

The case involves a criminal revision petition and two criminal appeals arising from an incident where the complainant, a forest officer, alleged that...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Section 326 IPC Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction for voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapon set aside as prosecution failed to prove intention or knowledge beyond reasonable doubt.

20 Feb 2024

The appellant, Junaid B, was convicted by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, D.K., Mangaluru in S.C. No. 2/2012 for an offence under Secti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court's Quashing of FIRs in Non-Compoundable Offences Based on Compromise. The Court held that Section 482 CrPC cannot be used to quash serious offences like attempt to murder and robbery merely on compromise, as it affects public interest and societal order.

20 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court of India heard two appeals by the State of Madhya Pradesh against separate High Court orders quashing criminal proceedings on the ba...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder and Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 307, 397 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness testimony was inconsistent and not supported by medical or other evidence.

6 Feb 2012

The appellant, Anil Lilachand Sarjare, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No.132/2007 for offences under Sections 307 read ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Robbery in Auto Rickshaw Snatching Case — Identification by Informant and Recovery of Stolen Articles Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 394 IPC.

24 Apr 2017

The revision petitioner, Mansingh Dhonduram Sakpal, was convicted by the trial Magistrate for the offence punishable under Section 394 read with Secti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Modifies Conviction from Dacoity to Robbery with Hurt in Appeal Against Sessions Court Judgment. Appellant Convicted Under Section 394 IPC Instead of Sections 395 and 397 IPC as Prosecution Failed to Prove Presence of Five Persons for Dacoity.

29 Aug 2006

The appellant, Balu Pandharinath Takle, was one of four accused charged with dacoity under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for al...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind to Bail Conditions. Detenu Granted Bail in One Case and Remanded in Another, Yet Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Likelihood of Release and Continued Dangerous Activity.

12 Jul 2016

The petitioner, Mohammed Asif @ Mental Abdul Sattar Shaikh @ Mohd. Asif @ Mental Abdul Sattar Khan, challenged a preventive detention order dated 15.1...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)