Search Results for "Section 37(4)"

487 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 487 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 6 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, P. Prakash, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Dharmapuri, under Section 6 of the Protection of Children fro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Sentence in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case — State's Revision Petition Allowed. Trial Court's Fine of Rs.10,000 Increased to Rs.50,000 for Offence Under Section 27(d) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

The State of Karnataka, through the Drug Inspector, Hassan Circle, filed a Criminal Revision Petition under Section 397 read with 401 of the Code of C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Writ Petition Challenging SRA Eviction Order — Petitioner Lacked Locus Standi as Non-Owner. Slum Rehabilitation Authority's Order to Hand Over Possession to Original Slum Dwellers Upheld Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Transcon-Sheth Creators Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition in the High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Lack of Evidence on Income. Claimant failed to prove permanent disability and loss of earning capacity, leading to reduction of award from Rs. 1,23,000 to Rs. 80,000 with interest at 6% p.a.

The case involves a motor accident claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The claimant, Parvez Framroz Billimoria, was injured on 17...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42(2) and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(c), and 29 of NDPS Act set aside as mandatory procedural safeguards were violated.

The appellant, Salim Jamshed Ali Shaikh @ Kanya, was convicted by the Special Judge (NDPS Act), Mumbai, in Special Case No.78 of 2010 for offences und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Decision That Ice Cream Is Not 'Sweet and Sweetmeats' Under Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. Ice cream is a distinct commodity not covered by Notification Entry 374 for reduced tax rate under Schedule Entry C-II-35(1).

The case concerns M/s. Vadilal Dairy International Ltd., a registered dealer and manufacturer of ice cream under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. The G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Murder and Cruelty of Wife in Dowry-Related Case. Circumstantial Evidence of Demand for Money and Death by Poisoning Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 498-A and 302 IPC.

The appellant, Prabhakar Shejul, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 498-A and 302 of the Indian Penal Code for causing the d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals by Obstructionists in Execution Proceedings — Purchasers During Pendency of Lis Not Bona Fide. Doctrine of Lis Pendens Under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Applies to Execution Proceedings, and Purchasers During Pendency Are Bound by Decree.

The case involves three second appeals arising from execution proceedings. The respondent decree holders (Respondent Nos.1-3) obtained a compromise de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Cases — Reduces Compensation Due to Lack of Proof of Income and Negligence. The court held that the Tribunal erred in assessing income without evidence and in fixing contributory negligence without proper basis.

The case involves three first appeals filed by the United India Insurance Company Ltd. against the common judgment and award of the Motor Accident Cla...