Search Results for "Section 364-A IPC"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Section 364-A IPC"

33 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 33 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeals in Kidnapping and Attempted Murder Case by Setting Aside Conviction Under Section 364A IPC. Conviction for Attempt to Murder and Robbery Upheld as Prosecution Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt the Strangulation, Burning, and Looting of Victim, But Failed to Establish Ransom Demand Essential for Section 364A Indian Penal Code, 1860.

3 Jan 2024

The appeals arose from a common judgment of the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur dated 26.06.2018, which dismissed the criminal appeals of the a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Kidnappers for Ransom and Attempt to Murder in Minor Boy Abduction Case. Appellants convicted under Sections 363, 364A, 307, 120B IPC and Section 4 of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 for kidnapping a minor for ransom and throwing him into a well.

31 Jan 2019

The case involves two appeals filed by Bhagwan Gajanan Phandat and Madhao Ravindra Kapade against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, K...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Conviction in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Non-Proving of Essential Ingredients. The Court held that Section 364A IPC requires proof of threat to cause death or hurt or conduct giving rise to reasonable apprehension, which was not established by the prosecution, leading to acquittal.

28 Jun 2021

The appeal arose from a criminal case where the accused was convicted under Section 364A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for kidnapping a school stude...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand for Ransom. Conviction under Section 364-A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the accused made a demand for ransom; conviction under Section 365 IPC upheld for abduction.

8 Aug 2012

The appellant, Mehtab Alam Lalai Choudhari, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for offences under Section 364-A (kidnappi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Modifies Conviction of Accused in Kidnapping Case from Section 364A to Section 363 IPC Due to Insufficient Evidence of Death Threat. The Court found that the prosecution failed to prove the essential ingredient of threat to cause death or hurt under Section 364A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, leading to a reduction in the severity of the offence.

1 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court addressed appeals by five accused persons whose convictions under Sections 148, 149, and 364A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for ki...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping for Ransom and Robbery Under Section 364-A IPC — Life Sentence Confirmed Based on Testimony of Victim and Circumstantial Evidence. The court held that the victim's testimony was credible and the chain of circumstances established the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt.

7 Dec 2006

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by three accused persons convicted by the Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, on 15.6.2002. The appel...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence in Kidnapping and Murder Case — Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen, Ransom Demand, and Recovery of Body. The court held that the chain of circumstances was complete and consistent only with the guilt of the accused under Sections 364A, 302, 120-B, 201 read with Section 34 IPC.

24 Apr 2020

The case pertains to the kidnapping and murder of an 8-year-old boy, Yug, son of Dr. Mukesh Chandak, a dentist in Nagpur. On 1st September 2014, Yug w...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition Against Death Sentence in Rape and Murder of Two Children. Conviction Under Sections 302, 376(2)(f),(g) and 201 IPC Upheld as Rarest of Rare Case.

7 Nov 2019

The review petitions were filed by Manoharan, the sole surviving accused, against the judgment of the Supreme Court dated 01.08.2019 which affirmed hi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in MCOCA Kidnapping Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand for Ransom. Conviction under Section 364A IPC and MCOCA set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the victim was kidnapped for ransom.

6 May 2016

The appellants, original accused nos. 1 to 4, were convicted by the Special Judge under MCOC Case No. 15 of 2005 for offences under Section 364A, 365,...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeals in Kidnapping Case, Quashing Conviction Under Section 364A IPC but Sustaining Conviction Under Section 363 IPC. Kidnapping for Ransom Charge Fails Due to Insufficient Evidence of Threat or Conduct Creating Reasonable Apprehension Under Section 364A Indian Penal Code, 1860, While Simple Kidnapping Under Section 363 IPC Stands Proven.

21 Feb 2024

The Supreme Court heard two criminal appeals filed by accused persons challenging their conviction and life sentence under Section 364A read with Sect...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)