Search Results for "Section 36(3)"

486 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 486 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Confirms Concurrent Findings on Possession and Title. Preliminary decree for partition of 40 cents on eastern side upheld as plaintiff proved prior possession and joint ownership of well.

The second appeal was filed by the defendants against the concurrent judgments of the trial court and first appellate court in a suit for declaration ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 363 and 376 of IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support prosecution case.

The appellant, Sri Subramani, was convicted by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kolar on 02.11.2018 in S.C.No.21/2017 for offences punis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Kidnapping Case Due to Voluntary Accompaniment by Minor. No 'Taking' Established Under Section 361 IPC as Minor Left Father's House of Her Own Free Will.

The appellants, Ashit s/o Adil Biswas, Madhav s/o Balram Gharami, and Suresh s/o Ramdas Bawankar (since abated), were convicted under Section 363 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Partition Suit in Joint Hindu Family Property Dispute — Upholds Trial Court and First Appellate Court Decrees. The court held that the plaintiff proved the existence of joint family business and properties, and the suit was not barred by limitation or res judicata.

The case involves a dispute over partition of Joint Hindu Family properties. The plaintiff, Premsukh, filed a suit for partition and separate possessi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Kidnapping Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Taking or Enticing Minor. Prosecution Fails to Prove Essential Ingredients of Section 363 IPC as Minor Victim's Testimony Does Not Establish That She Was Taken Away by Accused.

The appellants, Sau. Banu Ramchandra Borgaonkar and Sandip Kedar Pande, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Civil Court's Jurisdiction in Saranjam Property Dispute. The court held that the Bombay Rent-Free Estates Act, 1852 and Exemptions from Land Revenue Acts, 1863 do not bar civil court jurisdiction over title and possession of Saranjam properties.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the original defendant no. 1 challenging an order dated 22 February 2005 passed by the Joint C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Voluntary Accompaniment. Prosecutrix's Voluntary Conduct and Delayed FIR Undermine Allegations Under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC.

The appellant, Rajan Kannan Padiyachi, was convicted by the 1st Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan, in Sessions Case No.159 of 1997 for offences...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Identification. Conviction under Sections 364-A, 363, 365 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand of ransom and identity of accused beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to the kidnapping of a nine-year-old boy, Deepak, son of Mohanlal Oswal (PW1), on 30th June 1994 at about 7:30 p.m. from near his ho...