Search Results for "Section 35L"

11 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 11 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds That Question of Excisability of Goods Is a Question of Rate of Duty Appealable Only to Supreme Court Under Section 35L(2) of Central Excise Act, 1944, and Amendment Inserting Sub-section (2) Is Clarificatory in Nature.

The case involves a reference to a Full Bench of the Bombay High Court to determine the appealability of a Tribunal order regarding excisability of go...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Case on Real Estate Agent Classification. Extended Limitation Period Not Invokable Without Evidence of Willful Suppression of Facts.

The Commissioner of Service Tax, New Delhi, filed statutory appeals under Section 35L(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against a common judgment and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Affirms CESTAT's Ruling: Labelling Constitutes Manufacturing under Central Excise Law. The Supreme Court clarifies the interpretation of "manufacture" under Note 3 of Chapter 18 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, supporting the respondent's cenvat credit claim.

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether labelling goods amounts to "manufacture" under the Central Excise Tariff Act. The case revolved aroun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Central Excise Appeal — No Power to Review Under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944. Section 35L of the Act Bars Application of CPC Provisions on Review, Hence Review Petition Not Maintainable.

The petitioner, VIP Industries Ltd., filed a review petition before the Bombay High Court seeking review of an earlier order that dismissed its applic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case — Process Not Amounting to Manufacture Under Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944. Court Holds That Internal Order Deciding Jurisdiction Is Not Appealable Under Section 35 of the Act.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Haldia against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Remands Excise Dispute to High Court for Comprehensive Adjudication on Natural Justice and Statutory Validity Issues. High Court Erred in Limiting Decision to Vires of Section 9-D Without Applying Principles to Department's Actions Under Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944.

The appeals arose from a judgment and order dated 28th August 2009 by the Delhi High Court, which disposed of five writ petitions challenging actions ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Manufacturer's Appeals in Central Excise Classification Dispute. Classification of Benzene and Toluene Based on Purity Under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and Procedural Compliance Under Central Excise Rules, 1944 Were Upheld by Tribunal.

The appeals arose from a common order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) concerning classification and duty demands on...