Search Results for "Section 354-A"

258 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 258 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Corporation's Appeal in Stop-Work Notice Case Due to Vagueness and Non-Adjudication. Notice Under Section 354A of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Quashed as It Failed to Describe Nature of Construction and No Order Was Passed After Reply.

The appeal was filed by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai challenging an order dated 8 December 2009 passed by the City Civil Court, which q...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes FIR Against Doctor in Sexual Harassment Case — WhatsApp Messages Not Constituting Sexual Advances Under Section 354A IPC. Medical Advice via WhatsApp Does Not Amount to Sexual Harassment Under Section 354A of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The petitioner, Dr. Chethan Kumar S., a doctor by profession, was the duty doctor at Orbsky Hospital in JP Nagar, Bangalore. The complainant, a female...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Framing of Charges in Sexual Assault Case — Reiterates Limited Scope of Section 227/228 CrPC at Charge-Framing Stage

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Tarun Jit Tejpal against the judgment of the Bombay High Court at Goa, which had refused to discharge ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Construction Under Section 354A of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act. Tenant Failed to Prove Permission for Construction and Suit Was Barred by Lack of Statutory Notice Under Section 527 of BMC Act.

The appellant, Shivashankar Swami, filed a suit in the Bombay City Civil Court challenging a notice dated 5 July 1999 issued under Section 354A of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 515A of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Barring Civil Suits Against Demolition Orders. Provision held constitutionally valid as it does not oust writ jurisdiction and provides adequate alternative remedy.

The petitioner, Abdul Razzaq Sunesra, challenged the constitutional validity of Section 515A of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, inserted b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Sheds by Municipal Corporation. Petitioner Failed to Produce Authorization Under Section 351 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, Hence Demolition Upheld.

The petitioner, M/s Sub Vijay International Pvt Ltd, owned property bearing CTS No. 11A in Aksa, Borivali, Mumbai. On 13th April 1999, the Deputy Cont...