Search Results for "Section 351 notice"

240 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 240 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Revocation of Probate Not Maintainable on Grounds of Title Dispute. Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court held that a probate cannot be revoked on the ground that the testator lacked title to the bequeathed property. S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes POCSO Proceedings Against Husband and In-Laws in Matrimonial Dispute — Allegations Found to be Exaggerated and Vindictive. Court Held That Continuing Criminal Proceedings Would Amount to Abuse of Process of Law Under Section 528 BNSS.

The present criminal appeal arose from an order of the Allahabad High Court refusing to quash criminal proceedings against the appellants, who are the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Criminal Intimidation Case Due to Settlement Between Parties. Settlement Reached Between Applicant and Informant Leads to Quashing of FIR Under Sections 126(2), 351(1), 351(2) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

The applicant filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of FIR No. 51 of 2025 registered...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Subsequent Purchaser in Suit Challenging Municipal Notice Under Section 351 of MMC Act, 1988. Petitioner's Sufficient Interest Recognized as Property Owner Entitled to Be Heard Before Adverse Orders.

The Petitioner, Lodha Properties Development Private Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 26th February 2014 passed by the City ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 515A of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Barring Civil Suits Against Demolition Orders. Provision held constitutionally valid as it does not oust writ jurisdiction and provides adequate alternative remedy.

The petitioner, Abdul Razzaq Sunesra, challenged the constitutional validity of Section 515A of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, inserted b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Cheque Dishonour Case Under Section 138 NI Act. Settlement Agreement Creates Fresh Liability, Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Not Rebutted.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused, M/s. Cabral & Co. and its proprietor Francis Simon Cabral, against their convi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against BMC Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Construction. Notice under Section 351 of BMC Act, 1888 Held Valid as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title or Authorization.

The appellant, Namdev Pandurang Panchal, filed a suit seeking a declaration that a notice dated 19.10.2001 under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Appeals in Encroachment Dispute, Holding Civil Court Lacks Jurisdiction. Shopkeepers' Suits for Declaration of Title and Injunction Dismissed as Property Vested in Corporation Under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and its Assistant Municipal Commissioner filed appeals against an interim order passed by the City Civil C...