Search Results for "Section 32A IBC"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Section 32A IBC"

8 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Dishonour of Cheque Case Under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Despite Insolvency Proceedings. Criminal Liability Under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Continues Simultaneously with Insolvency Resolution Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 as Proceedings are Penal and Not Covered by Moratorium Under Section 14.

15 Mar 2023

The dispute arose from a dishonoured cheque issued by M/s Rainbow Papers Limited, a company, to Tourism Finance Corporation of India Limited, a public...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing MPID Act Attachment Against Corporate Debtor's Property. Section 32A IBC Overrides MPID Act as Property Acquired Prior to Offence and Corporate Debtor Not Accused.

8 Jun 2026

The petitioner, Dwarka Iron Industries Pvt. Ltd., as the Successful Resolution Applicant of the corporate debtor M/s. Abhirama Steels Limited, filed a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Liquidators Challenging Benami Act Attachment Orders, Upholds NCLAT Ruling that IBC Authorities Lack Jurisdiction to Entertain Challenges to Benami Act Orders During Insolvency Proceedings

24 Feb 2026

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of civil appeals filed by liquidators challenging provisional attachment orders issued under the Prohibition of Be...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Set-Off Claim in Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The court held that set-off is permissible during CIRP as it promotes efficiency and equity, and the moratorium under Section 14 does not automatically prohibit such adjustments when claims arise from mutual and connected transactions.

3 Jan 2024

The appeal before the Supreme Court involved a dispute between Bharti Airtel Limited and Bharti Hexacom Limited (Airtel entities) and Aircel Limited a...

Tribunals

NCLAT Upholds Sale of Corporate Debtor as Going Concern in Liquidation — Confirms Immunity Under Section 32A IBC. Liquidator's Application for Confirmation of Sale and Immunity Allowed Despite Objections from Suspended Directors.

27 Sep 2024

The appeal arose from a common order dated 27.09.2024 passed by the NCLT, Chennai, in IA(IBC)/415/2024, IA(IBC)/1701/2023, and IA(IBC)/1757/2023 in th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case Due to Abatement Under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944 — Settlement Under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 Renders Proceedings Infructuous and Extinguishes Liability.

30 Sep 2024

The appellant, M/s Patanjali Foods Limited (formerly Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd), filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, ch...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeals in Execution Proceedings Against Directors Despite Moratorium Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The court held that moratorium under Section 14 IBC applies only to the corporate debtor, not to its directors, allowing execution to proceed against directors if they are otherwise liable under the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission order.

17 Jan 2024

The dispute arose from execution applications filed by homebuyers (appellants) to enforce an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commiss...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Steel Plant Operation Under Pollution Board Supervision Pending Environmental Clearance Compliance. The Court held that the High Court erred in discontinuing interim orders allowing operation under Board supervision, balancing environmental protection with livelihood concerns.

1 Oct 2021

The case involves Electrosteel Steels Limited, which owns a 1.5 MTPA integrated steel plant in Bokaro, Jharkhand, employing 3,000 regular and 7,000 co...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)