Search Results for "Section 31(2) Specific Relief Act"

69 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 69 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Sale Agreement Alleged by Plaintiffs Not Proved; Defendant's Mortgage Claim Upheld.

The appellants/plaintiffs filed a second appeal against the judgment and decree of the Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli, dated 21.11.2002 in A.S....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows MSEDCL's Petitions Challenging CGRF Orders on Recovery of Additional Charges from Consumers. MERC Orders on FAC and AEC Recovery Upheld as Binding on Distribution Licensee.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a group of writ petitions filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) challenging orders...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Andhra Pradesh High Court Judgment: 'Ghee' is a Product of Livestock. Market Fee on Ghee Regulated under Andhra Pradesh Markets Act, 1966

The Supreme Court, in this case, addressed whether "ghee" falls under the definition of "products of livestock" under The Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Impleadment Applications by IPS Officers in Central Armed Police Forces Recruitment Rules Case. Impleadment Denied as Applicants Lacked Direct Legal Interest and Were Not Necessary Parties Under Order I Rule 10 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The Supreme Court dealt with interlocutory applications filed by Indian Police Service officers seeking impleadment in special leave petitions arising...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Condonation of Delay in Filing Written Statement — Petitioner's Right to Defend Not to Be Defeated by Technicalities. Delay of 312 days condoned as sufficient cause shown and no prejudice caused to respondents.

The petitioner, a retired judge, was a defendant in O.S. No. 171/2014 pending before the Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Mangaluru. The suit was filed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Applications in Cheque Dishonour Cases Due to Non-Application of Mind by Trial Court. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is rebuttable and trial court must consider defence evidence before convicting.

The case involves three criminal revision applications filed by Rajat Jaiprakash Rastogi, Mrs. Gursimran M. Deol, and Lt. Col. B.T. Jade against M/s. ...