Search Results for "Section 27(3A)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Section 27(3A)"

4 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Interest on Refund of TDS Under Section 244A of Income Tax Act — Mandamus Issued for Payment of Interest on Delayed Refund. CBDT Communication Denying Interest Held Contrary to Statutory Provisions and Quashed.

19 Jan 2016

The petitioner, M/s. Sunflag Iron & Steel Co. Ltd., a public limited company engaged in steel manufacturing, entered into an agreement with a German c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Quashing Petitions in FERA Prosecution — Exoneration in Adjudication Not a Bar to Criminal Proceedings. Adjudication and criminal prosecution under FERA are independent proceedings with different standards of proof and objectives.

21 Feb 2006

The judgment concerns two criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of orders passed by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty Proceedings in Income Tax Case Due to Delay in Issuance of Notice Under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Notice Issued After 8 Years from Filing of Return Held Barred by Limitation.

14 Mar 2006

The applicants, Indian Plywood Manufacturing Co. Ltd. and others, filed income tax returns for the assessment year 1992-93 on 13th September 1992. The...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Rejection of Waiver Application Under Section 273A of Income Tax Act — Commissioner Directed to Reconsider Without Applying Section 237A. The Court held that the Commissioner misapplied Section 237A (refund provision) instead of properly considering Section 273A (waiver of penalty) for full and true disclosure.

10 Jul 2006

The petitioner, Sushila Shantilal Jhaveri, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay High Court challenging an ord...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)