Search Results for "Section 269SS Income Tax Act"

12 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 12 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Conviction for Cheque Bounce Upheld. Dishonour of Cheque for Discharge of Existing Debt Attracts Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The criminal revision petition was filed by the accused-petitioner challenging the judgment dated 31.10.2012 passed by the II Addl. District and Sessi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted. Accused Failed to Prove Defence of Blank Cheque Given as Security, Leading to Confirmation of Sentence Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The case arises from a complaint filed by the respondent (complainant) against the petitioner (accused) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening of Assessment Under Section 147/148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Based on Mere Change of Opinion Without New Tangible Material is Invalid.

The petitioner, M/s. Crown Consultants Pvt. Ltd., a share and stock broker, filed its return of income for assessment year 2007-08 on 30 October 2007 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case. Journal Entry Set-off for Loan Repayment Does Not Violate Section 269T of Income Tax Act, 1961, as It Is Not a Repayment but an Adjustment of Mutual Claims.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which deleted the penalty ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tax Appeals in Income Tax Case — Commission and Deposit Additions Upheld as Findings of Fact. No Substantial Question of Law Arises Under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, Vijay Narayandas Rizwani, was an assessee carrying on business of distribution of country liquor. For the assessment year 1994-95, he f...