Search Results for "Section 216 Cr.P.C."

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Section 216 Cr.P.C."

6 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6 result(s)

High Court

High Court Quashes Trial Court’s Order Directing Re-Trial Under Section 216(4) Cr.P.C. in Murder Case Transferred to CBI. The Court Holds that Section 216(4) Cr.P.C. Does Not Empower Trial Court to Efface Evidence or Order De Novo Trial; Only Alteration of Charge and Examination of Witnesses for Altered Charge Permitted.

31 Aug 2024

The matter arose from a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, challenging an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Additional Charge Under Section 467 IPC Against Accused in CBI Case — No Prima Facie Evidence of Forgery for the Purpose of Cheating. The court held that a letter of credit is not a valuable security under Section 467 IPC and that the chargesheet lacked material to support the additional charge.

27 Feb 2024

The petitioners, Nikhil Girish Patt, Ilesh Shah, and Sooraj Kumar Tayade, were accused in a CBI case registered as RC No.02/E/2013-Mumbai under variou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Additional Charge Under Section 467 IPC in CBI Case — No Prima Facie Evidence of Forgery. Court held that mere fabrication of accounts without evidence of creating false document with intent to cause damage does not attract Section 467 IPC.

27 Feb 2024

The petitioners, Mr. Nikhil Girish Patt, Mr. Ilesh Shah, and Mr. Sooraj Kumar Tayade, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition Against Alteration of Charges in Electricity Act and IPC Case. Court Holds That Alteration of Charge Under Section 216 Cr.P.C. Is Permissible Before Judgment and No Prejudice Caused to Accused.

7 Feb 2024

The criminal revision petition was filed by the accused No.1, Sri Shivappa, challenging the order dated 11.07.2022 passed by the Court of I Additional...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Alteration of Charge in Criminal Case Due to Defective Framing and Violation of Cr.P.C. Provisions. Non-compliance with Section 239 Cr.P.C. and improper joinder of distinct offences under Sections 212, 218, 219, 220, 223 Cr.P.C. renders charge illegal and liable to be altered.

12 Jan 2018

The petitioners, Bharat Uttam Rajurkar, Mahadev Uttamrao Rajurkar, and Sachin Mahadevrao Rajurkar, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay Hi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition, Sets Aside Order for Alteration of Charges Under Section 216 Cr.P.C. — Application Filed After Commencement of Trial and After Examination of Witnesses Held Not Maintainable

30 Jun 2016

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the petitioners (accused) against an order dated 11.06.2015 passed by the Additional Civil Jud...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)