Search Results for "Section 21(C)"

8 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Expressway Land Acquisition Compensation Process; Dismisses Farmers’ Writ Petitions

The petitions were filed by farmers whose lands were acquired for the Jalna–Nanded Super Express Highway project. The landowners challenged the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Rejection of Nomination for Waqf Board Election Due to Non-Application of Mind. Petitioner's Candidature as Muslim Advocate Member Under Section 14(1)(b)(iii) of Waqf Act, 1995 Upheld.

The petitioner, Mr. Asif Ali Shaikh Hussain, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash the order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Foreign Nationals in NDPS Case Due to Lack of Conscious Possession. Conviction under Sections 21(C) and 28 of NDPS Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession of heroin beyond reasonable doubt.

The judgment pertains to two criminal appeals filed by foreign nationals, Marek Jaroslaw Lewandowicz and Johann Tuchler, against their conviction unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Specific Performance Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's discretion to deny specific performance and award damages instead, finding no grounds for interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Rolta India Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 8th December, 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Held that the Trial Court Erred in Dismissing Suit for Non-Prosecution Without Considering Merits and That the Suit Was Not Abated Despite Death of Sole Proprietor as Legal Representatives Were Brought on Record.

The present appeal arises from a suit filed in 1983 by the original plaintiffs (respondents herein) against the original defendant, Bitesh Hanumantrao...