Search Results for "Section 2(1)(c)"

11 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 11 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Expressway Land Acquisition Compensation Process; Dismisses Farmers’ Writ Petitions

The petitions were filed by farmers whose lands were acquired for the Jalna–Nanded Super Express Highway project. The landowners challenged the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses CIDCO's Writ Petition Challenging Review Order in Land Acquisition Reference. Held that review application under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC was maintainable as there was an error apparent on the face of the record regarding non-consideration of earlier judgments.

The present writ petition was filed by the Administrator, Nashik, City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. (CIDCO) challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Rejection of Nomination for Waqf Board Election Due to Non-Application of Mind. Petitioner's Candidature as Muslim Advocate Member Under Section 14(1)(b)(iii) of Waqf Act, 1995 Upheld.

The petitioner, Mr. Asif Ali Shaikh Hussain, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash the order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Specific Performance Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's discretion to deny specific performance and award damages instead, finding no grounds for interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Rolta India Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 8th December, 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals by Apparel Companies Challenging Provident Fund Damages Order. Establishment of separate code number for each unit does not absolve liability under Section 14B of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

The case involves multiple writ appeals filed by apparel companies (M/s J.D. Clothing Company, M/s Gokaldas India, M/s Wear Craft Apparels, and others...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Held that the Trial Court Erred in Dismissing Suit for Non-Prosecution Without Considering Merits and That the Suit Was Not Abated Despite Death of Sole Proprietor as Legal Representatives Were Brought on Record.

The present appeal arises from a suit filed in 1983 by the original plaintiffs (respondents herein) against the original defendant, Bitesh Hanumantrao...